The FISA court has no authority over Session’s recusal. The decision to recuse himself was based upon AG standards, guidelines, and protocol and not some FISA directive.
Yes, but Sessions would observe polity by informing SCOTUS that he was recused and is now un-recused before requesting clarity on conflicts based on declassified material.
The reason to unrecuse is the revelation that a fraud was perpetrated upon the FISC which is supervised by the Chief Justice of the SCOTUS.
So who + what exactly transpires when the Court is misled, it carries out unconstitutional acts and violates rights of US Citizens and is then used as a tool of a deep state coup?
Remember we still don’t know what the 4th FISA says
Either it’s more of the same meaning that it’s more lies and corruption of the Court(s)
or
It’s got something in there along the lines of “you were told this before but now we’re suspicious and going to investigate”
In any event, a Judge who serves on the FISC has been recused. There are bogus FISA’s in the midst.
It also warrants mention that Roberts as Chief Justice may be further compromised in these regards & may himself need to recuse.