[NELSON111]

Here's the problem: I don't think anyone really knows what kind of recusal he has but him. His statement makes it clear he is recused from Russia and the campaign. He said in the statement before Congress that he intended to do that. But that's worth a bucket of warm spit. Loretta Lynch did the same thing and she didn't. So...there you go.

Back in October of 2017, he told Hugh Hewitt the following:

HH:"I look forward to hearing that decision. A couple of other issues I want to run through with you, Mr. Attorney General. I know you’re recused from most of the Russia stuff. But are you recused from the investigation into the Steele dossier and GPS Fusion?"

JS:"Well, I have not made a formal announcement on what kind of recusal I might have there. But I could well be, and so…"

The only thing he would say is that he was recused from the Clinton Foundation. But...gee...here we are...and nobody really knows exactly WHAT he is recused from. Multiple sources have reported that he was not recused from those things. So, Clinton Foundation yes...probably concerning Hillary...perhaps not Bill. Everything else no. That keeps his word to Congress.

Stay tuned

[FreeReign]

Here's the problem: I don't think anyone really knows what kind of recusal he has but him.

Sessions, under oath, gave specific examples of the type of things that he is recused from