I have the worst memory ever and am terrible at going to find stuff to post.
But I do know I read that, either in an EO or amendment to the military code of justice, or something, that indeed the AG (which would include Huber) and/or the Department of Homeland Security would be working in conjunction with the military on some tribunals or other.
Maybe some researcher type will be able to find that. I learned it from a Q post.
So, Defiant. Your basic premise is wrong, in this case.
Bagster
A US Attorney may may bring charges against defendants who will ultimately be tried by tribunal, either because the defendants aren’t US citizens, or even if they are citizens, they conspired/aided/abetted the enemies of the constitution and are so deemed treasonous.
Buckle up. Pay attention to LG’s hearing dialog with Kavanaugh. He laid it out clearly.
I’d have to see the EO before I agreed to your premise. A tribunal is run by a military judge, not an Article III judge. Not appointed and confirmed, but coming through the ranks. The prosecutors and defense counsel are JAGs. I am not aware of a way a US Attorney or Assistant US Attorney can try a case in a military tribunal. The rules of procedure are completely different. There is a jury of officers that decide the cases, for one thing. I could see an EO that had DOJ attorneys refer defendants to a military tribunal, or that had military justice officials send a defendant to the US attorney, but not one that had them working to prosecute cases together. It would make no sense.
If you find something that Q said that made you think that Huber and some Colonel are going to be double teaming the cabal, please send it to me and I’ll take a look. Til then, I think your premise is wrong, in this case.