[Ben Ficklin]

The NeoCon republicans were the first to agitate for Obama to intervene in Libya but he said no and was backed up by the SecDef.

But the Liberal Interventionists being led by Hillary worked up a multi lateral agreement involving the UN, NATO, and the Arab League. Based on the multilateral agreement, Obama went in.

The NeoCons praised Obama for intervening but criticized the multilateral agreement as "leading from behind"

Benghazi had nothing to do with the intervention in Libya, it was totally separate. Prior to the Libya intervention, Obama had killed Al Libi in Afghanistan with a rocket fired from a drone and it was later announced by Al Queda which caused the retaliation attack in Benghazi and there were actually two separate attacks at BenGhazi

[Peter ODonnell]

I am just curious to know, what charge does anyone think might stick against any of the named U.S. high officials or Soros, with regard to Libya? Tresaon? Racketeering? Reckless endangerment?

I would imagine their lawyers might argue that stupidity has never been treated as a criminal offence. If it were, seventy million voters should be in jail right now.