Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BlueMondaySkipper; bagster
Looks like Sessions is baking up another batch of cookies! Soros is targeted? ;)


2,090 posted on 09/13/2018 12:51:02 PM PDT by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1965 | View Replies ]


To: Steven W.
Oooooo.

The Keebler Elf stirs.

My favorite line is;

"...attempts to undermine the integrity of our election process--especially by foreign countries and other bad actors...

Second favorite line;

...once we do (identify enemies of our country) we will take action to bring them to justice".

#SettingTheTable

#SmellsLikeCookiesUpInHere

#EnjoyTheMovie

Bagster


2,093 posted on 09/13/2018 1:00:49 PM PDT by bagster ( "Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2090 | View Replies ]

To: Steven W.

FanFreeQingtastic.

Deepies lost.


2,131 posted on 09/13/2018 1:41:16 PM PDT by little jeremiah (When we do not punish evildoers we are ripping the foundations of justice from future generations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2090 | View Replies ]

To: Steven W.; Cboldt; blu
MY INTERPRETATION of q-2170:

1) Q begins with a question: "How do you demonstrate 'reasonable cause' to regulate and/or break up BIG TECH?"

2) Then Q presents a repeating pattern:

-Aggression (Projection)
-Suppression (Fascism)
-Censorship (Narrative-Dogma)

3) Then Q demonstrates that MULTIPLE ENTITIES are carrying out the SAME PROGRAM. These include [ANTIFA], [FAKE NEWS] and [[TWITTER, FB, GOOG, YT, REDDIT, etc..].

4) The ANSWER to Q's Question JUMPS OUT at us. The pattern, ganging together to ban lawful websites, public speakers etc. is a CONSPIRACY IN THE RESTRAINT OF TRADE. It VIOLATES the SHERMAN ANTITRUST ACT and is subject to criminal prosecution as well as the potential awarding of treble damages to its victims.

Here is a synopsis from Cornell Law School:

Broad and sweeping in scope, § 1 of the Act states that “[e]very contract, combination in the form of trust or otherwise, or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations, is declared to be illegal.” § 2 of the Act further prohibits monopolization or attempts at monopolizing any aspect of interstate trade or commerce and makes the act a felony. Federal district courts have the jurisdiction to enjoin violations of the Sherman Act, and these proceedings are instituted by United States Attorneys in their respective districts. The injured party (whether it is the federal government, an individual state, or a private party) is entitled to three times the amount of injury that it has suffered; this award is known as treble damages.

For a full text of the Sherman Antitrust Act, see:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/15/usc_sup_01_15_10_1.html

2,142 posted on 09/13/2018 2:06:35 PM PDT by Disestablishmentarian (Read "American Betrayal" by Diana West)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2090 | View Replies ]

To: Steven W.

Love the expression “other bad actors” in that AG/DOJ release!


2,299 posted on 09/13/2018 9:11:05 PM PDT by bitt (We know not what course others may take, but as for me, Give me Liberty, or Give me Death!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2090 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson