> "Huber is working as de facto SC. Q alluded to to this in several drops". You get to "allude" about "Q" and nobody else does ? "
ALL CAPS KEEP IN MIND SESSIONS IS RECUSED, THEREFORE CAN HAVE NO CONTACT, NO TOUCH, NO DISCUSSIONS, NO PHONE CALLS, NO MEMOS, NO DOCUMENTS COMING OR GOING, NO REMARKS, NO PRESS COMMENTARY ___ ON ANYTHING TO DO WITH RUSSIA. COUP CABAL ARE INNOCULATED, PROTECTED BY PSYCHOLOGICAL PROJECTION AGAINST ANY INVESTIGATION INTO THEM INVOLVING RUSSIA ___ CLEVER TRICK YES? HOW TO DEFEAT WITHOUT AG INVOLVED? ANONS THINK 2ND SC IS ANSWER. NO. BETTER ANSWER IS HUBER.
Now to Huber; 92 references to Huber in Q drops.
Q linked article referring to Huber as better than SC on multiple occasions. Linked to Breitbart Turley article TWELVE times, starting in #986 April 2 and most recent in #1975 August 28.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/03/31/turley-sessions-using-utah-federal-prosecutor-much-better-trump-2nd-special-counsel/
Why is Q pounding Anons with Breitbart link?
Anons are arguing with Q that nothing is being done, that another SC is needed. Q responds, from Q Post #2071:
But… HUBER [ability to prosecute + empanel a grand jury outside of
DC [90%+ voted HRC (2016)], who already began the
investigation(s) late last year w/ assigned team of 470 investigators
(attorneys) + IG + legal jurisdiction across all 50 states, is not a
‘special counsel’ so therefore nothing is being done
Q is saying to complaining Anons that Huber is acting as de facto SC but a better version of one.
One example of many, relatively recent #2007:
Why is 'Huber' being discussed now?
What if the TX Congressman was not supposed to drop that
name?
Why is 'Huber' being discussed now?
Why is 'Huber' (all of a sudden) being grouped into the 'Anti-
Sessions' remove, fire, ….nothing being done?
Discussed by Right or Left?
Huber did not 'directly' interview….[insert name]?
Huber did not…….
Huber did not…….
Sessions did not…….
Sessions did not…….
When will Sessions…….
When will Sessions…….
Who does Huber work with specifically?
Who investigates?
Who prosecutes?
Team of 470?
Will BO transcripts be released?
Huber + IG + 470?
Inside or outside of the DC [SWAMP]?
How many members of Congress not seeking re-election?
SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE not seeking re-election?
How many Senators have resigned or not seeking another term?
How many (senior) FBI have been removed?
How many (senior) DOJ have been removed?
Nothing to See Here.
But….
We should 'attack' them 'head on'….in DC….using a 2nd SC….
Emotion clouds judgement.
What is Q saying in #2007 above?
Q is responding to Anons and to Members in Congress and high profile conservatives. What are they clamoring about? They are clamoring about nothing being done, that a 2nd special counsel is needed. Q says no. This is counterproductive. Q keeps linking Breitbart article quoting Turley.
The reason to downplay Sessions: First, Sessions can't have a thing to do with the most important fight, most important focus of Trump Presidency which is the coup. Why is it the 'most important'? Because if coup is successful, the entire Trump movement comes down, collapses. Q says the Midterms are everything to the Dems/Left. Ergo, everything is secondary to the coup and Sessions has taken himself out of it. Second, Sessions is replaceable but not now because GOP members have conferred with POTUS that Sessions removal now will raise campaign issue and cause turmoil leading to Midterms. So Sessions stays for now.
Sessions is not hated, not disliked. Sessions is viewed with frustration. Folklore has arisen that Sessions is a master plotter behind the scenes. No, Sessions is recused. People keep forgetting that and/or they don't know what it means. It means Sessions can't have an iota of anything to do with the coup because the projection to Russian Collusion has been partially successful. This is why WH warriors turned to IG and IG's 470 investigating army of attorneys, inspectors, auditors. But IG needed capability to subpoena, to convene grand jury, to indict ==> HUBER!
But Sessions could not hire Huber to investigate coup cabal including Uranium One because Sessions is recused, So Sessions hired Huber to investigate many things outside of Russia scope including child trafficking. But Huber is investigating coup plotters, who broadened Huber's scope? Not RR. Answer is WH. POTUS did via WH lawyers. People forget POTUS is Chief Prosecutor in the land, not Sessions.
Why wasn't RR tasked to investigate coup plotters? Obvious, RR is part of problem.
Who is smearing Q for saying "TRUST SESSIONS"? Q haters criticize Q followers for believing in a conspiracy that says to TRUST SESSIONS.
But Q has not said to trust Sessions for a long time. POTUS did not increase his attacks on Sessions until mid-August starting with Ainsley Earhardt interview on Fox.
Sessions is not trusted to stop coup. Sessions is recused. Sessions can have nothing to do with coup prosecution, nothing, not one iota of involvement.
Sessions will be treated respectfully. He will step down in November. He will be thanked for his service. A WH shakeup will ensue. An Acting AG will be brought in under 1998 Vacancies Reform Act. In the months following, Acting AG will clean up the coup attempt. If Senate is retained by GOP, a new AG will be appointed and confirmed. If no GOP control, POTUS must rely on statutes that allow selecting from DOJ employees that have been with DOJ in capacity for at least a year. Another reason for delay is to give chance to groom candidates for Acting AG. Vacancies Reform Act statutes allow for any person of POTUS choosing to act for 210 days. Need groom other promising candidates for 210 + 155 days. There is a timeline for all this to occur.
The DOJ/FBI are entrenched with Obama/Clinton cultists. This has been stated on Q threads. Timeline is made against statutes to allow for grooming new DOJ/FBI groups loyal to MAGA. DOJ prosecutes Obama/Clinton network but first need to identify, clean out entrenched Obama/Clinton acolytes.
It means Sessions can't have an iota of anything to do with the coup Short version rebuttal;
"Sweep the legs".
Think about that as you review the NUMEROUS Q posts reiterating the "removals from power" of the derps within the DOJ and FBI. Then ponder who you think is ultimately responsible for that. [RR]?
Sessions sweeps the legs, while appearing innocent and trustworthy to the public and not an extention of Nazi Trump, thanks to the dems, derps, and frankly, people like you (ThankQ). It's important that conservatives whine about Sessions to give the proper appearance.
So I won't argue too hard against the Sessions deniers, lest we lose them (you) as an asset.
I just thought you were smarter than that, Hostage. I do enjoy your brain, goodman.
I will pay you, for real, one hundred American dollars if Sessions is gone at the end of November if you'll pay me the same 100 samolians if he's still AG on December 1st.
Do you accept?
#NotABetGamblingIsBad
Bagster
Makes it interesting and makes it sometimes logical, but again, it's your interpretation and repeating the same stuff doesn't make it so..
I don't think #2007 says what you think it says and in fact "Q" 2071, of which I posted about Sessions and you chose to ignore, iterates 2007, in my opinion.
You say But Q has not said to trust Sessions for a long time
but that's kinda hokey.
"Q" hasn't said "trust" any single person in a long time that I could see - since April 2018 ( God in June 2018). "Q" has been mostly saying "Trust yourself" and "Trust the plan".
I am as frustrated with Sessions recusal (among other things) as anybody. But it's not like Sessions is sitting on his hands.
Notwithstanding any of this, mid-terms will probably dictate everything.