“it also proves you have no reading comprehension skills try again...”
No, it does not follow that I have no reading comprehension skills. Look to your own house. What Q posts is not evidence of anything.
To begin with, I merely quoted what DiGenova said that the FBI witness had not been interviewed by either Huber or the Inspector General. And if you insist on nit picking, I assume DeGenova meant the two men literally or their subordinates. The Inspector General evidently refuses to interview the witness.
I just happened to catch Jim Jordan question Sessions about appointing a special prosecutor to investigate Uranium One. Exposure in that one area alone will bring down the whole house of cards, involving the present actors in the Russian hoax investigation plus Obama and Hillary. Jordan listed all the reasons and said that it would “seem like” a special prosecutor would be warranted. Okay words, but not a legal term, so the little shrimp Jeffy, ignoring the many reasons listed why a prosecutor should be named and dispensing with them, deceptively jumped on the words “seems like” and sneeringly said something to the effect that “seems like” just did not cut it as a legal basis for appointing a special prosecutor.
And this concept about not talking about an ongoing investigation is laughable nonsense. It is only an evasion. Ask yourself, to use a much used meme of Q, do they follow that tenet with the Mueller investigation?
Again your ignorance of what is happening is not proof nothing is happening
https://saraacarter.com/fbi-interviewed-uranium-one-informant-in-clinton-foundation-investigation/
former FBI informant who spent more than six years undercover gathering information on the Russian energy and uranium market was recently interviewed by FBI agents from the Little Rock, Arkansas field office as part of an ongoing bureau investigation into the Clinton Foundation
DOJ Sends Boeing 757 to Little Rock, Federal Agents Load Boxes of Documents
The Washington Post reported that the grand jury has summoned more than one witness and the case is still underway. It remains unclear who were summoned to testify.
The existence of the panel indicates that the authorities are treating McCabe’s actions during his time at the FBI seriously and may even press charges if sufficient evidence is found.
TRY AGAIN...
Another disrupter fail. You guys (Mac Truck, Golden Eagle, etc.) are working to hard to miss what’s under your nose. How many proofs have to be provided?? Then again, when you act blind, I guess you miss what’s really going on.