Replies

I went back through Tracy Beanz’s transcript of her video and can’t find reference to it (monthly subscription fee) so I may be mistaken. I recall her squealing about it and now I can’t find it? I dunno. The group can still monitize their effort if I am mistaken about the monthly access fee.

I hope others will have posted more info to help us understand this drop by the time I click “send.” :)

I’ve looked at Drake’s tweets again, and the drop. Unless someone can add more information here, I still think Q advises against that report. It would help clarify things if I knew something about Drake - if anyone has info, please share.

Reading through the transcript, I see part that kind of raised a caution flag:
`````````````````````````````````````````
“there’s
been a lot of information that our group,
and other groups and individuals, have
given to Congress and ...to Mr. Horowitz, the DOJ, OIG
and other agencies and departments that
... when we post all that on these
websites available for the public and
available for other agencies to look at
...then it’s
going to be pretty clear that they’re
gonna have to do something ...because if not,
anybody that doesn’t take action ....
they’re gonna be guilty of obstruction of justice
... we made an oath to defend
the Constitution, but against both
foreign and domestic enemies and we know
that if that information is power... we want this
information the hands of the people to
make decisions for the people not the
oligarchy ....” *

So this group seems to be saying they don’t follow Q content and are not satisfied with Horowitz’s or the president’s timing and that by putting the information out there, they can compel them to act or face charges of obstruction of justice.

I guess that’s the ? mark about this report/group all along. WHy not give the info straight to POTUS/Horowitz? Apparently they DID give it to (Horowitz) the gov and he hasn’t PUBLICLY acted on it yet so by giving the public this information, they want to FORCE action on their time table or the public will be given the impression that the government is obstructing justice. Not good, in my opinion.

Based on this transcript excerpt, the group seems to want to steer and control the gas pedal because they feel the Trump administration won’t. Or worse, they want to steer the public away from POTUS’s/Q’s strategy. They can expect to harne$$ public frustration (monetize it) with “nothing is happening” by suggesting that their “reports” will force the Administration to act. Their use of the word “but” before “both foreign and domestic” sounds possibly adversarial to our government (Trump, Horowitz etc.)

As one of the interviewees says “knowledge is power” and then Q says “knowledge is power,” I think Q is taunting them. That’s my read but I’m open to correction.

* That portion of the transcript was excerpted from the following Tracy Beanz video (see link) in which she reviews Ann Vandersteel’s interview with two of the founders of the group who are describing and announcing the website and report.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TwGtIlYilhY&t=1468s