And what does her resume have to do with whether Horowitz (not Huber) interviewed her client?
Please stay in the ballpark. I believe her when she says that Huber (not Horowitz) didn't interview her client. She would know.
Her credibility is not the point, but you know that. This is what you do when you're beaten logically. Change the subject to another strawman.
You're playing the losing hand, derp stater. Go get new talking points and come back. Daddy will be here. That concludes your daily ass whoopin'.
(The following is not for you. You are unteachable. This is for anybody reading who might think you're smarter than as 5th grader.)
Why is 'Huber' (all of a sudden) being grouped into the 'Anti-Sessions' remove, fire,
.nothing being done?
Discussed by Right or Left?
Huber did not 'directly' interview
.[insert name]?
Huber did not
.
Huber did not
.
Sessions did not
.
Sessions did not
.
When will Sessions
.
When will Sessions
.
Who does Huber work with specifically?
Who investigates?
Who prosecutes?
But Victoria Toensig worked for Reagan. Haha. Think logically.
p.s. Anybody that starts a sentence with "LOL" needs to catch a crack (not a threat, Mary. Don't pee yourself).
And just like that, Mickety Mac, the derp state operative, used up his Bagster daily issue. See yas, Mac.
*poof*
Derp.
Bagster
“Two long running, Obama era, investigations of two very popular Republican Congressmen were brought to a well publicized charge, just ahead of the Mid-Terms, by the Jeff Sessions Justice Department. Two easy wins now in doubt because there is not enough time. Good job Jeff ”
Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 3, 2018
Looks like President Trump is having trouble trusting the plan.
That miserable little piece of ordure.