Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Jamie Von - conspiracytheorist; bagster; ransomnote

I did a post reply to one of the more antagonistic responders at the Q is a hoax thread. I thought you might enjoy it. Oh, I forwarded it to Bagster and Ransomnote.
````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
You seem to have a propensity for jumping to conclusions here:

{The problem is that, regardless of your stance on the issue, many of Trump’s base are falling for this crap. It is dividing his base. That will have a very bad result during the midterms}
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
People who are following the stream of information provided by Q are either Republicans and will vote for President Trump and in the midterms will vote for those who will further the Presidents agenda. If they are Dem’s who are infiltrators they would vote Dem regardless.
____________________________________________________________________________________

{-IF those who believe this “QAnon” bullsh*t choose to not be active in getting out the vote, because they think some “white hat” is going to march on the scene and “fix” everything w/o we voters lifting a finger in support of Trump.}
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I am gathering, from this run on sentence, that you are trying to say individuals who follow Q don’t support President Trump?
How does trying to look for evidence for one’s self imply not supporting Republican’s in the midterms? When Q makes his comments, the anons and FreeQs do real time research to find the insideous dark side of Dem’s ultimate goal; to overthrow our great country. This information may be very useful at the right time.
____________________________________________________________________________________

{Do you understand the problem?}
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The only problem I can see here is that there are people who jump to wild conclusions. You need to have supportable premises of your argument to reach a valid conclusion. Regretfully, that is missing. Instead what I see is an angry person venting without even knowing what he’s really angry about.
- Unless there is an ulterior motive to your rant?


1,598 posted on 09/05/2018 6:06:29 AM PDT by Kalam (Poor me, I have lost my tagline :())
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1555 | View Replies ]


To: Kalam
Well done, Kalam.

Do you get the impression that the Q debunkers are running out of steam?

It's like their hearts aren't in it anymore. They seemed much more animated and confident in their position a while back. Now? Not so much.

They really have nothing behind their arguments other than shrill emotion and illogic.

#IAmCrushingTheirHeads

And so are you.

What are you doing?

Bagster


1,612 posted on 09/05/2018 6:45:04 AM PDT by bagster ( "Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1598 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson