I think it would be informative. Shouldn’t the PBS be an extension of the guy who is in office? Shouldn’t he control the content?
“THIS IS TNN”
TRUMP NEWS NETWORK
ha ha ha
I agree it should be informative. In fact, that’s kinda what I was getting at with the first and third components. It should be like breitbart, and it should have a fast pace with a lot of audio/visual content. It should the opposite of PBS or NPR though. Those can delve into topics more than most, sometimes, but the pace is slow, the style is floofy and pseudo-intellectually self aggrandizing.
What do most news networks do to provide content to fill the spaces between commercial breaks (the real reason they exist). They put talking heads on with pre-scripted monologues, fill the spaces between segments or content with boring/slow graphic transitions, then provide interview subject (or a panel) and they waste time with lots of opinionated drivel and very little hard cold information!!!
I imagine Trump Channel having 5x the news staff, consultants, and content technicians then the best news rooms in the world, and I imagine the pace of delivering true information to far outstrip anything out there. Most shows give me Attention Deficit. You have to wait forever to get to the nuggets, and most of the time they never deliver on what they tease, not in a substantial way. I imagine a news delivery service that actually feeds your focus.