You might say this is Q's big validity test. If as much (supercomputers, spy and comm sats, etc.) did go down, that would affect so many folks and tjeir jobs that it would be hard to hide,
If they were taken down --as claimed in the Qdrops, that would validate Q --big time.
I don't see how all the resulting "chatter" surrounding a successful takedown of multiple systems could be concealed...
Also -- do you know how to check the DEFCON level? If s much capability as claimed went down, that probably would trigger a DEFCON upgrade...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
BUT -- If nothing went down as Q claimed; that could spell the end of the Q movement.
TXnMA
Thank you to all who posted and lurked. This thread is now retired. I hope you will join us on the new thread:
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This is EXACTLY the danger of this 3rd-pary disinfo ... that when it is proven false, it discredits the truth it was sent to poison.
What I read into Q's messages was quite different than the bogus "news" story. I read it that Five-Eyes agencies might be being sent a warning, that if they don't cooperate with POTUS/Q, they'll lose all access to U.S. satellite intel.
Need I point out, this would be a typical negotiating maneuver by our great POTUS?
There will never be any official confirmation if this is the case.
What a perfect opportunity for the Derps to debunk Q, right?
Just have the CIA put out the word that NO SURVEILLANCE satellites or computers were disrupted or taken offline. Get the MI6 to confirm theirs are completely functional too.
BOOM no more Q.
Q knows. The derps know.
That's what's important. Oh, and now we know too.
Thanks, Q.
Was not the taking down not shutting down but removal of access to C_A and DS?
Q IMO merely created a set of blinders for the Black Hats while maintaining access and oversight for the White Hats. We have it all ?
Master coup on Qs team part, again just my interpretation. WWG1WGA!