[bagster]

Tap the brakes there, sonny. This could be another version of troll.

Eh?

I suppose it's possible that the article is a lie, Q lied, and all satellites and computers are doing just fine.

Anything's possible, I guess.

I'm sticking with Q, though, grampy.

:)

[Disestablishmentarian]

I suppose it's possible that the article is a lie, Q lied, and all satellites and computers are doing just fine.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

I'm not saying Q is wrong. I'm saying don't get sucked in by this non-Q article.

When wanna-bees write articles that play on real Q drops, and obviously play on the vanities of Q followers, it is a way of leading us down a blind alley and possibly to later being refuted and subjected to the Derp tactic of ridicule for believing what was, in fact, disinformation.

Please note that the article in question goes much further than Q in describing details, implications and responses. This is just cheese for the trap.

These people are stupid ... but, lets remember, they're not all that stupid when it comes to psyops.