[Cboldt]

-- And if Q is wrong, we might as well just pack it up and fade away into that good night, for Q is a Larp.
Same for the "sealed indictment" issue, for that matter. --

We disagree on that "premise -> conclusion" too. I think Q has inside information (my definition for "not a larp"), but I don't expect Q necessarily has a sound legal foundation with which to judge the more exciting contentions advanced. And I also give Q leeway to gin up the crowd with BS.

Trump said some exciting things on the campaign trail, not all of them have come true ... heck, "build the wall" is still hung up in Congress, and immigration, an existential issue for the nation state, is still on the wrong track.

Does that make Trump a larp? LOL.

[Golden Eagle]

I don't expect Q necessarily has a sound legal foundation with which to judge the more exciting contentions advanced. And I also give Q leeway to gin up the crowd with BS.

You should put this disclaimer at the bottom of every post then, in the name of actual honesty and full disclosure. Might help those that hang their lives on Q’s every pronouncement as well.

[bagster]

No. Trump is not a Larp. I saw him on t.v. several times. Unless my t.v. is a Larp.

I don't expect Q necessarily has a sound legal foundation

On this point we can agree. Q doesn't strike me as a lawyer type. More a military/intel sort of team. I just don't see them going off half cocked on this one without a sound legal basis. Remember. Years in the planning.

So the indictments and the military tribunals are intended as either disinformation or to "gin up the crowd" as well?

I don't imagine that Trump and his Generals all sat around talking about military tribunals as part of THE PLAN without a sound legal basis and consultation with legal minds. They must have access to lawyers, judges, and Constitutional scholars who would have advised them on the legality of their plans.

If, of course, we are to believe that the Q team is what we think it is.

The possibility does exist, as you explain, that the indictment talk and the military tribunal talk is all just intended as disinformation to scare the enemy or to "gin up the base".

I highly doubt it, though. Perhaps the Generals and the legal minds they consulted are just wrong on the legality.

But anything's possible, I guess.

Bagster