Well yes, I’m definitely agreeing with you that it is not a coincidence. That’s what I meant when I said the words in the acronym appear contrived enough that it’s fairly obvious they were going for this specific arrangement/pattern of characters. Now, are they saying that Osiris is king, or do they just think that using old mythological names is entertaining to use, such as naming the satellites of most of the planets in our solar system from the roman pantheon, it’s much harder to know.
OSIRIS was never ‘king’. OSIRIS was a god, But RE or RA is the chief god only just a step beneath MAAT (The Cosmic Principle). The name would have been OSIRIS-REX not OSIRIS-REx had they meant OSIRIS to be seen as ‘king’.
This is a puzzle which is not resolvable really without some inside NASA information which will never happen. We can only worry the edges ...
This penchant is too consistent over the decades to be mere entertainment, especially as most people do not have a clue who OSIRIS or RE were, let alone any knowledge of history current or historical, let alone ancient or Egyptian (other than the fake consensus history on TV channels).