Replies

The greatest "tragedy" that I see. Not entirely sure if that is the right word or not but stay with me. I have read just about every book ever written about the Kennedy's. I was born about a month after Dallas. All the adults around me were obsessed with it and I guess so am I.

Joseph P. Kennedy was a bad guy. I think that has been well documented. But why was he a bad guy? Well among other reasons he wanted to fit in to the Boston Protestant society. He did not. So can't be accepted there? Ingratiate yourself to the upper class. Provide the booze for the party. The upper class wants the booze, they just don't want to get their hands dirty. He also was greedy and had delusions of grandeur.

My personal opinion (which all of this is of course) is that FDR sent Kennedy to the court of St. James (as ambassador to England) for three reasons. One to give the King of England a jab. Two, for both FDR and the king it had to have been very entertaining to see this money grubbing, lower class Irishman parading around like he was someone. (Bloodlines). Finally, number three it got a large pain in his (FDR's) back side out of his hair.

Well documented that Joseph Kennedy had at least initially been quite taken by Hitler. But there again, think bloodlines. There again shut out. Basically he would do anything, be anything say anything to be in the elites. They laughed at him. (I could go on, but you get the idea).

Now fast forward. JFK see's what his father is and how he was treated. Maybe he wants revenge against the elites. He starts his plan. But he tipped his hand. The elites killed him. Then his brother.

So to wind up my point. The very idea that the Kennedy family is still sucking up to the elites is absurd. But what is really galling is giving their award to a CIA plant. Almost the entire family falls into the useful tool definition.

I really want JFK JR. to still be alive if for no other reason than to shut all the rest of them up forever.

Good catch; another double meaning: Smile For The Camera: The Double Life of Cyril Smith

https://www.amazon.com/Smile-Camera-Double-Cyril-Smith/dp/1849546444/

No politician pandered to the media's appetite for personality more than Liberal MP Cyril Smith. Instantly recognisable for his colossal build, Smith was a larger-than-life character in a world of dull grey men. He spoke for the everyman, and his forays into show business blurred the lines between politician and celebrity. Yet 'Big Cyril' was anything but the roly-poly gentle giant of popular imagination. In November 2012, Rochdale MP Simon Danczuk outed Smith in Parliament as a serial child abuser. Now, in an astonishing tale of a spectacular misuse of power, he describes how Smith used his profile to groom and sexually abuse young boys, frequently in institutions he had helped to establish. His victims, often troubled boys from broken homes, had no voice against their attacker and, though rumours abounded, Smith's appalling crimes went unnoticed by the public and unpunished by the authorities. A story deeply rooted in the political culture of the 1970s and '80s, Smile for the Camera brings to life Cyril's domineering personality and his sickening predilections. It reveals the extraordinary double life of a man who hoodwinked the public and evaded justice for decades.

“The temperance movement was an elite created movement just like today we have big issues like Apartheid which are made up by them to keep us busy. Joseph Kennedy and Onassis, two other top 13 Illuminati families got rich off of the
temperance movement by bootlegging” (Bloodlines of the illuminati, Springmeier, 1995)

There are 240 references to the Kennedys in that book. Which raises the question, if they were members of the Cabal, why kill Kennedy? Or kill 2 Kennedy’s and possibly compromise the other brother? Doesn’t make sense.