Replies

NEW Qs

#1905

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 489187 No.2627887
Aug 16 2018 11:16:35 (EST)

Anyone have problems w/ their 'XBOX Live' accounts shortly after the drop yesterday?
[Purge]
How many coincidences before mathematically impossible?
Q

__________________________________________________________

#1906

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 489187 No.2628048
Aug 16 2018 11:24:50 (EST)

Anonymous ID: 431d94 No.2627990
Aug 16 2018 11:22:05 (EST) Screen Shot 2018-08-16 at 12.20.30 PM.png

>>2627908
>>2627887
for anyone questioning if this happened or not

>>2627990

__________________________________________________________

#1907

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 489187 No.2628219
Aug 16 2018 11:33:17 (EST)

Anonymous ID: ecf8fa No.2628080
Aug 16 2018 11:26:19 (EST) ClipboardImage.png

ClipboardImage.png

>>2627887

>>2621616 08/15/18 (Wed) 23:02:52 (PDT)

>>2628080
Nothing to see here.
Drops equate to reaction/action?
Q

____________________________________________________________

#1908

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 489187 No.2628352
Aug 16 2018 11:38:24 (EST)

Ask yourself simple questions.
If ES was trying to travel to UIO from HKG.
Why would he route through Russia?
How many direct flights (per day) from HKG to UIO?
What if Russia was the original target?
Ask yourself, would you NOT want to be at your preferred destination PRIOR TO going public?
Logical thinking.
Q

_________________________________________________________

#1909

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 489187 No.2628569
Aug 16 2018 11:49:37 (EST)

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 489187 No.2627887
Aug 16 2018 11:16:35 (EST)
Anyone have problems w/ their 'XBOX Live' accounts shortly after the drop yesterday?
[Purge]
How many coincidences before mathematically impossible?
Q

Dbzo14qV4AACv6p.jpg

DkrGNJXU4AAYxZA.jpg

>>2627887
Nothing to see here.
Q

___________________________________________________________

#1910

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI No.163
Aug 16 2018 11:58:30 (EST) inscom.png

What happens if FISA fails or 'signers' cannot be trusted?
Who signed the CP FISA?
How do you keep something SECURE & SAFEGUARDED when those at the top of ABC depts are CORRUPT and being REMOVED?
https://www.army.mil/inscom
https://www.inscom.army.mil
PATRIOTS ONE AND ALL.
Q

________________________________________________________

#1911

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 0b7c69 No.2628837
Aug 16 2018 12:07:20 (EST)

Anonymous ID: 79d84f No.2628758
Aug 16 2018 12:02:59 (EST)
>>2628721
Never have I been so proud to be an Army Soldier! Hooah!

Anonymous ID: ff083b No.2628768
Aug 16 2018 12:03:27 (EST)
So, aha, Q
You now have half the board thinking ES is Eric Schmidt and the other half think ES is Edward Snowden
Please confirm which

>>2628758
Hooah! Soldier.
Thank you for your service.
God bless.
Q
>>2628768
It should be clear in this context ES = @Snowden
It should be clear based on prev drop re: game comms why ES was included.
It should be clear that 'ES' was used in both (GOOG + @Snowden) drops to est a link.
Q

____________________________________________________________

If I copy the Q drop I have to format everything and that is too much time, so I will just copy the Q links, or rather where they take me:

https://www.army.mil/inscom
https://www.inscom.army.mil/

The first link takes me to a page with tops stories, the most recent is this one, I am copying the entire article:

https://www.army.mil/article/209500/new_dod_policy_prohibits_gps_enabled_devices_in_deployed_settings

New DOD policy prohibits GPS-enabled devices in deployed settings

By Jim Garamone, DoD NewsAugust 7, 2018

This includes physical fitness aids, applications in phones that track locations, and other devices and apps that pinpoint and track the location of individuals.

“Effective immediately, Defense Department personnel are prohibited from using geolocation features and functionality on government and nongovernment-issued devices, applications and services while in locations designated as operational areas,” Pentagon spokesman Army Col. Robert Manning III told Pentagon reporters yesterday.

Deployed personnel are in “operational areas,” and commanders will make a determination on other areas where this policy may apply.

The market for these devices has exploded over the past few years, with many service members incorporating them into their workout routines. They use the devices and applications to track their pace, running routes, calories burned and more. These devices then store the information and upload it to central servers where it can be shared with third parties. That information can present enemies with information on military operations.

USING GPS DEVICES POSE RISK

“The rapidly evolving market of devices, applications and services with geolocation capabilities presents a significant risk to the Department of Defense personnel on and off duty, and to our military operations globally,” Manning said.

These Global Positioning System capabilities can expose personal information, locations, routines and numbers of DOD personnel. Their use in overseas locations “potentially create unintended security consequences and increased risk to the joint force and mission,” Manning said.

Personal phones and other portable devices also contain apps that rely on GPS technology, and they will be affected. Commanders will be responsible for implementing the policy, and they will be allowed to make exceptions only after conducting a thorough risk assessment.

Security is at the heart of this guidance. DOD is seeking a balanced way that allows for legitimate official and personal uses of geolocation technology that does not impact security.

Manning said the department will continue to study the risk associated with these devices and change the policy as needed.

The second link takes me to a page that says this:

Your connection is not secure

The owner of www.inscom.army.mil has configured their website improperly. To protect your information from being stolen, Firefox has not connected to this website.

Learn more…