An interesting reply to Scott Adams' video (from the video's comments section):
-----------
However, I was disappointed. It had all the veneer of erudite, sound facts, fairly tight and unassailable conclusions etc. Yet, much of that was merely appearances. The impressiveness was only skin deep.
Here's some different responses to his presentation:
SIGH. You are a smart, clever man. However, as one very high IQ bloke who has an above average success rate distinguishing reality from non-reality . . . You make a lot of decent to good points.
Most of your points are reasonable to a point. Your suggestion, implication, is that more or less each of them carries their water the whole distance to durn near proof. When, actually, they don't.
One of your topics--Bible Codes--you are simply wholesale wrong on. 1. IF the code word field length is 30 characters or less, YES, those can be found in any sufficiently long book.
2. HOWEVER, If the code field length is 50 and certainly 70, 120+ characters long, then EMPHATICALLY NOT--NO--OTHER BOOK BUT THE BIBLE yields anything remotely sensible or meaningful compared to the Biblical results. That is a crucial distinction.
3. That does not even get into the geometric authentification results. SOME of the Bible codes have multiple code fields on the same page. And in many of the cases, the surface text key words and the coded key words cross each other precisely. And, in many of the cases, the whole set of code fields on the page make a beautiful design--often a field of crosses of various consistent sizes.
4. The best site is BIBLECODEDIGEST.COM They have a lot of very significant discovered codes in their archive. This is their link to their BIBLE CODE MYTHS page.
https://biblecodedigest.com/page.php?PageID=523
5. One of the things I think you and your schema seems to miss is the fact that there are purposes, reasons to present material much as God does in The Bible and in life. There is sufficient evidence for FAITH but not sufficient evidence MOST of the time to FORCE belief--i.e. to take away choice in the matter.
6. Some Q-Anon predictive-like drops have been more specific and fulfilled more specifically than you seem to give credit for.
7. imho, there are a LOT of VERY BRILLIANT folks (my IQ is only 160+) who are convinced Q-Anon is the real deal. imho, they base a lot of their discernment, assessment on tiny puzzle pieces assessed intuitively toward a reasonably solid set of conclusions.
8. Similarly, you could say that some of those tiny puzzle pieces are NUANCE. imho, few people seem to give proper due to nuance when assessing such things. Yet, the specific women who happen to be in the top 3rd standard deviation range from the mean on intuition can accurately make life and death judgments very successfully--significantly, if not largely based on nuances involved in the field, context, actors being assessed. You did not seem to give proper weight to nuance.
9. There can also be an authentic spiritual element to assessing reality. Folks used to walking more or less full of Holy Spirit and gifted by Him in an abundance of discernment, tend to be above average in their discernment and assessments of reality from falsehood.
10. The recent furor of the MSM media coming out like a lynch mob against Q-Anon is one of the most genuinely remarkable confirmations of Q-Anon on the table. Anytime the globalist oligarchy starts winding up their MSM stooges to that shrill degree--in lock-step parroting of the oligarchy's party line--you can durn near bet that the *opposite* of whatever they are spewing is virtually guaranteed to be wholesale to totally true.
11. PRAYINGMEDIC.COM is a super sharp, very anointed & Spirit-Filled; very discerning 30 year medic bloke who has experienced 100's of miraculous healing in his work. He also happens to frequently (as does his similar wife) have Spirit fostered dreams that have authentic true information about Q-Anon and related stuff. He's balanced, reasonable, solid, stable, etc. He also happens to have a very wonderful, warm and gracious personality.
12. It will be interesting to see what you have to say once Q-Anon has been publicly verified by POTUS emphatically as authentic, real and accurate.
