Fruit of the Poisonous Tree is an extension of the Exclusionary Rule. You don’t just call it like a Mulligan in golf. There has to be a “Suppressions Motion and subsequent Hearing. The judge then decides which evidence is allowed or denied. Since there was no Motion or Hearing then any evidence can be used. A Defense Lawyer does not call “Fruit of the Poisonous Tree” and the evidence disappears.
That is why the Meuller Cabal won’t try Flynn. He can still ask for his hearings on evidence he was unaware of as of his plea. Meuller is $hitting his pants over that. Manafort made no such Motions. There are many things that would apply to the meuller SC cases. This is not one of them. Unless Meuller presents evidence that touches upon the illegal search and seizure rules, Manafort is out of luck.
I’m well aware of the procedure for exclusion, being an attorney. I know they filed a motion about Mueller, but as I recall, it was pretty weak and didn’t challenge the appointment on the right grounds, as the Russian company did. Also, in connection with such a motion, you would be entitled to discovery that supports the grounds for the motion. That would include looking into the FISA warrants that led to the Russia hoax investigation that led to the Comey leaks intended to get Mueller that led to Mueller. That was all illegal, is all being hidden by the deep state, and this Judge would not have put up with their efforts to hide what they did. He would have thrown it out, either when they failed to comply, or when they did comply and showed that the basis for the investigation was unconstitutional wiretaps and lies.