Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BenLurkin
Clicked over and read the article. On the same page it shows four of the new NASA astronauts. Two are male and two are female. Does anybody think that just happened to be a coincidence that of four of the most qualified people we have two are men and two are women? Call me skeptical.

If we did it all over again today starting from scratch how many of the "Mercury" astronauts would be female?

IMO if we had to do it all over again today starting from scratch we would fail miserably. Quite simply we would have never landed on the Moon if we had the type of PC thinking that we have today. Don't believe me, just take a tour of mission control in Houston. The men that entered that room were there because they were the smartest men in the room. They were the smartest men in any room and you did not gain entrance because you were female or black or white or muslim or any other such nonsense. You got in that room by being the very best of the best and 110% committed to the supreme success of the United States Of America.

The article states she was a fighter pilot. Good grief what are we thinking?

21 posted on 08/04/2018 5:26:37 PM PDT by precisionshootist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: precisionshootist

Nine astronauts selected, only two are women.

https://www.businessinsider.com/nasa-announcement-astronaut-crew-spacex-boeing-selection-2018-8#the-space-agency-hasnt-confirmed-precise-launch-dates-for-any-of-the-four-crewed-missions-which-are-about-two-years-behind-schedule-13


22 posted on 08/04/2018 9:19:02 PM PDT by iowamark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson