Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: mac_truck
A blogger named “The Forensicator” analyzed the “last modified” times in one set of documents released by Guccifer 2.0. Based on the size of the documents and the times they were downloaded, Forensicator calculated that a hacker was able to copy the files at a speed of more than 20 megabytes per second.

In other words he plagerized the original work of Binney and VIPS

I think you have it backwards. The VIPS /Binney memo, sent to the President, is at thisLINK.

Here is the key paragraph from that memo:

Key among the findings of the independent forensic investigations is the conclusion that the DNC data was copied onto a storage device at a speed that far exceeds an Internet capability for a remote hack. Of equal importance, the forensics show that the copying was performed on the East coast of the U.S. Thus far, mainstream media have ignored the findings of these independent studies [see here(1) and here(2)]

If you go links here(1) and here(2) you will find the firt is a blog that reports about work done by the Forensicator, and the second is the Forensicator's own website!

In other words, VIPS/Biney gave credit to the Forensicator as the "independent analyst" in their original report.

It's wrong to call him a plagiarist. He is the original source of the analysis, and deserves credit, not scorn.

1,196 posted on 08/03/2018 6:19:40 PM PDT by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1188 | View Replies ]


To: Jack Black

Ignore the troll he is failing so bad he has resorted to trying to discredit Q based on articles not even posted by Q

The question is which groups does the troll come from

Fake MAGA supporters
Bandwagon shills
Or Paid shills


1,205 posted on 08/03/2018 6:56:47 PM PDT by edzo4 ("Well I truly would be thrilled if all/most of the Q stuff turns out to be real")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1196 | View Replies ]

To: Jack Black
In other words, VIPS/Biney gave credit to the Forensicator as the "independent analyst" in their original report. It's wrong to call him a plagiarist. He is the original source of the analysis, and deserves credit, not scorn.

Good post, and I'll stand corrected...if Binney/VIPs vouches for him as a source that's good enough for me.

However, none of this stuff should ever be presented under the banner of Qanon, as all of the researchers and reporters cited in the VIPs memo as well as the entire Wikileaks family have disavowed Q as nonsense.

1,240 posted on 08/03/2018 7:49:31 PM PDT by mac_truck (aide toi et dieu t'aidera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1196 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson