Well people do have varied opinions of how they view Q’s postings, including those within Q’s varied groups of followers. So I wouldn’t call people detractors unless I wasn’t open to reasonable discussion....As we know there’s been occasions of infighting even among the groups who have folded over into Q’s’ followers...... Additionally there are those who are and having been ‘observing’ how Q’s developed and along the way..the tactics used etc. So of course then there are those differences of opinions as well.
I find it interesting that there appears to be a large number of people who accept this information from Q even though they don’t know if there’s a real person or people behind it...or who it is as well as when his forecasts are proved wrong...... But then we’ve had this in the past and it seems to get recycled every generation, that there is someone who is really pulling the strings but cannot be identified.....So here we are!
Caww, if you had been with us the day Q had us ride shotgun to save Michael Avenatti’s ass (as a witness), you would totally get it.
No matter how one reads your 2 paragraph explanation. it doesn’t and can’t explain your trite remark as follows: “Just think Internet Gamers and that covers it.”
However, some mentalities & personalities seemingly can't abide avoiding really smug, haughty, ignorant smack-downs of Q & those of us who are supportive of the clearly POTUS directed Q efforts.
Therefore, imho, the naysayers deserve a lot of the blow-back they get.
Q doesn’t forecast, the interpreters may. It seems one of the primary detractor lines is either due to not catching that or deliberately ignoring it.