Posted on 07/31/2018 10:24:29 AM PDT by re_tail20
It all began, and ended, on this day 43 years ago.
It was a hot July afternoon, nearly 92 degrees, when Teamsters president and labor icon Jimmy Hoffa is said to have opened the rear door of a 1975 maroon Mercury in the parking lot of the Machus Red Fox restaurant, in Bloomfield Hills, Mich., and climbed in.
But I believe, based on my 2004 investigation, that Frank Sheeran did it.
"Suspects Outside of Michigan: Francis Joseph "Frank" Sheeran, age 43, president local 326, Wilmington, Delaware. Resides in Philadelphia and is known associate of Russel Bufalino, La Cosa Nostra Chief, Eastern Pennsylvania," reads the 1976 HOFFEX memo, the compilation of everything investigators knew about Hoffa's disappearance that was prepared for a high level, secret conference at FBI headquarters six months after he vanished.
Sheeran, known as "The Irishman," told me that he drove with Hoffa to a nearby house where he shot him twice in the back of the head. Our investigation subsequently yielded the corroboration, the suspected blood evidence on the hardwood floor and down the hallway of that house, that supports Frank's story.
No one who has ever boasted about knowing what really happened to Jimmy Hoffa has had their claims tested, scrutinized, and then corroborated by independently discovered evidence... except Frank.
He is also the only one of the FBI's dozen suspects who has ever come forward and talked publicly about the killing, let alone admit involvement.
Every other claim that you have ever heard about, from Hoffa being buried in the end zone of Giants Stadium to being entombed under a strip of highway asphalt somewhere, came from people who were never on the bureau's list of people suspected of actual involvement.
For that reason, Frank stands alone.
Six weeks after Hoffa disappeared, Frank, along with...
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Your confusion is due to how the relevant clause of the 5th Amendment has been mischaracterized in popular fiction and by the media. The clause says says no person “shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself.” It has nothing to do with guilt or innocence, despite the popular misunderstanding that to take the 5th means you must be guilty. Instead, as others on this thread have already pointed out, it is intended to prevent the government from using coercion to obtain the result the state wants, whether or not it is the truth.
Got it.
This is one of the more believable scenario’s, gunshot, cremation, all believable.
By the way, the Constitution does not require a person to state the reason why they exercise their 5th Amendment right. I don’t know when or why it became a thing that people would say they take the 5th on grounds that to speak would tend to incriminate themselves. If ever I was in such a situation, I would simply say I exercise my rights under the 5th Amendment and if pressed for a reason would quote the relevant clause and point out I am not required to give a reason.
Mueller will look into it he knows the Russians must have had a hand in it.
You make a good point but you have to remember that Hoffa was nothing more than a thug who thought his mob, the Teamsters, was mightier than the Italian mob and likely felt he was invincible.
Hoffa's mob just busted heads and knees while the mob used guns..........
I'd love to see this mystery come to a TRUTHFUL end and an accurate documentary made out of it.
As for DeNiro starring in a movie about this, forget it..............
You need to watch this video. It is worth it. Take the time.
Don’t talk to the police.
https://youtu.be/i8z7NC5sgik
That for Beowulf, the rest of you are cc’s.
It’s the job of the government to prove you are guilty, it’s not your job to prove it for them. Without the 5th amendment, the government could just come up with all sorts of ways to coerce you into confessing, whether you were guilty or not.
Too many people confuse the Right to Remain Silent with the 5th.
Most of the people I see using that tactic, are talking to the police. They’ll talk a while, then plead the 5th(sic), then continue talking. If you aren’t going to talk, don’t talk.
Sovereign citizens are a special kind of stupid.
Well, the right to remain silent is an extension of the right against self-incrimination in the 5th amendment, so there isn’t really much difference.
Two separate things. You can’t plead the 5th if you aren’t under oath.
I never was under the illusion that Hoffa was not as bad as the rest of them.
Had no idea there was a movie about it or coming out about it or whatever.
No, but you can assert the same constitutional right.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.