https://drive.google.com/file/d/1B_ZhvANgwS65nHCpJWy0plJugbuPWYhW/view
is a pdf of evidently a professional study from 2009. The number of sealed indictments was considerably under 1,000, if I understand the text and charts properly. I didn't read every word but I think I got the gist of it accurately.
What do you think of that study and whether it offers any helpful input into my curiosity?
That's the same article I referred to you, including page numbers and contents. It's the same article that notes ALL indictments are sealed as a matter of course in some districts. It's the article cited (wrongly) for the proposition that only 284 sealed indictments were filed in 2006.
-- I didn't read every word but I think I got the gist of it accurately. --
If you think you got it accurately, that works great for me. I'm glad you finally noticed the article. One point I will make again is to notice the difference between a sealed case and a sealed indictment. Those are not the same thing. Sealed cases are uncommon. Sealed indictments are THE RULE (no exception) in some federal districts.
I think you are jerking me around. I posted a link to that in 1,454 posted on 07/31/2018 6:00:37 PM PDT. Clearly, you are acting in bad faith. Earned a place on my fairly large twitlist.