[bagster]

If Q is what everyone says,

Including you, Jack?

then we have to assume this was deliberate. Q doesn't want reporters writing stories about him,

Are you sure? What, then, explains Q's response to this anon.

I almost hope they don't ask. It would be fun to watch them try to manage the spin when 90% of the country is aware of you and all that you've been shining a light on, while the MSM still can acknowledge it. I can see them squirming now..

(Partial Q response)

It must happen.
Conspiracy no more.
Think of every post made.
It would force us to prove everything stated to avoid looking crazy, correct?
What do they fear the most?
Public awakening.
If they ask.
They self destruct.
They know this is real.
See attacks.
The build is near complete.

Don't be so sure you know what "Q wants."

And did you really defend the media blackout of Q as a source by referencing their "all in" on deep throat as a source?

Come on now, Jack.

Think logically.

Bagster

[Jack Black]

Don't be so sure you know what "Q wants."

I'm not, It was speculation, for the sake of discussion.

And did you really defend the media blackout of Q as a source by referencing their "all in" on deep throat as a source?

Yes, let me try again to explain my position on this:

If Q wanted to be like Deep Throat he could go to any of several dozen reporters (maybe even Woodward, who is still reporting at the Post) and say "I am Mr. Q and I work at Agency Y, and I would like to tell you things.

Then, after Woodward or whoever checked out Mr. Q (and tried fo find a second source for the most spectacular claims) you would have stories being published by Named Reporters. This happens every day in Washington, and it is simply NOT THE SAME as reporting on what a completely anonymous person on 4chan says.

Come on now, Bagster, Think logically.