Jack, I want to add this: I agree that Q per se is not useful as a “Source,” due to the factors you outlined.
But clearly, Q IS BIG NEWS, based upon tens of millions (or more) of followers all around the world; and, as an intrepid reporter could easily determine, both an unimaginable access to information (such as shots from airports around the world, Oval Office, obscure connections which prove absolutely on target etc.) for any private individual ... and, of course, many amazing instances where future has proved the past.
Then, after covering all that, an honest reporter (Ha! As-if) could certainly point out there are some apparent misses by Q, or at least assertions which have not been verified.
I repeat: Q, the Q phenomenon, the Q movement, the Q information drops are all HUGE, PERFECTLY VALID NEWS STORIES.
(Pinging Bags with this—our own intrepid newshound)
Q