Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ransomnote
NEW Q

#1711

Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: d74be4 No.2296993 📁
Jul 26 2018 11:44:26 (EST)

https://1zwchz1jbsr61f1c4mgf0abl-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Gohmert_Mueller_UNMASKED.pdf📁
What was the point of filing impeachment art if Ryan was going to reject?
Known beforehand?
Optics.
Think logically.
Could Sessions publicly challenge [RR] w/o creating a dilemma?
What events would immediately transpire if Sessions challenged [RR]?
Would it immediately demonstrate that Sessions must be aware of key Mueller facts?
Facts (or failure of duty) that he cannot possibly ‘know’ if recused?
Facts (a case) he is suppose to be recused from?
Think logically.
One challenge to [RR] would immediately trigger attacks to remove Sessions given his clear involvement in receiving information re: a case he is fully recused from.
Who does Huber [directly] report to?
Is it normal [RR] is side-stepped re: Huber CoC?
Why is this important?
Why did Sessions recuse?
Is the LEFT attacking Sessions?
What advantage(s) exist based on this setup?
POTUS publicly expresses his anger re: his recusal?
Do you believe POTUS would allow a complete takeover of his DOJ if nothing was being done behind the scenes to hold people accountable?
When POTUS states “the swamp is being drained” do you believe it?
When POTUS states “it’s happening” do you believe it?
Do you believe POTUS would allow Sessions & [RR] to run HIS DOJ if something wasn’t being done to his liking?
LOGICAL THINKING.
Clickbait derails logical thought.
Think for yourself.
Trust yourself.
Mueller investigating POTUS’ Tweets for obstruction?
You have a front row seat.
Enjoy the show.
Q

_________________________________________________________

147 posted on 07/26/2018 10:48:00 AM PDT by No_Doll_i
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies ]


To: No_Doll_i

My take.

> What was the point of filing impeachment art if Ryan was going to reject?

Optics.

> Known beforehand?

Yes.

> Optics. Think logically.

> Could Sessions publicly challenge [RR] w/o creating a dilemma?

No.

> What events would immediately transpire if Sessions challenged [RR]? Would it immediately demonstrate that Sessions must be aware of key Mueller facts?

Yes sir!

> Facts (or failure of duty) that he cannot possibly ‘know’ if recused?

Yes sir!

> Facts (a case) he is suppose to be recused from? Think logically.

Yes.

> One challenge to [RR] would immediately trigger attacks to remove Sessions given his clear involvement in receiving information re: a case he is fully recused from.

Speaks for itself.

> Who does Huber [directly] report to?

Sessions.

> Is it normal [RR] is side-stepped re: Huber CoC?

No.

> Why is this important?

Good question!

> Why did Sessions recuse?

I’d like theories on this one.

> Is the LEFT attacking Sessions?

Nope!

> What advantage(s) exist based on this setup?

They’ll be hoist by their own petards! This includes Rosenstein!

> POTUS publicly expresses his anger re: his recusal?

Optics!

> Do you believe POTUS would allow a complete takeover of his DOJ if nothing was being done behind the scenes to hold people accountable?

No!

> When POTUS states “the swamp is being drained” do you believe it?

I do!

> When POTUS states “it’s happening” do you believe it?

Yes!

> Do you believe POTUS would allow Sessions & [RR] to run HIS DOJ if something wasn’t being done to his liking?
LOGICAL THINKING.

Exactly! Trust Sessions! But do we trust RR?

> Mueller investigating POTUS’ Tweets for obstruction?

Nope!


244 posted on 07/26/2018 2:09:59 PM PDT by Snowybear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson