#1711
Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: d74be4 No.2296993
Jul 26 2018 11:44:26 (EST)
_________________________________________________________
My take.
> What was the point of filing impeachment art if Ryan was going to reject?
Optics.
> Known beforehand?
Yes.
> Optics. Think logically.
> Could Sessions publicly challenge [RR] w/o creating a dilemma?
No.
> What events would immediately transpire if Sessions challenged [RR]? Would it immediately demonstrate that Sessions must be aware of key Mueller facts?
Yes sir!
> Facts (or failure of duty) that he cannot possibly know if recused?
Yes sir!
> Facts (a case) he is suppose to be recused from? Think logically.
Yes.
> One challenge to [RR] would immediately trigger attacks to remove Sessions given his clear involvement in receiving information re: a case he is fully recused from.
Speaks for itself.
> Who does Huber [directly] report to?
Sessions.
> Is it normal [RR] is side-stepped re: Huber CoC?
No.
> Why is this important?
Good question!
> Why did Sessions recuse?
I’d like theories on this one.
> Is the LEFT attacking Sessions?
Nope!
> What advantage(s) exist based on this setup?
They’ll be hoist by their own petards! This includes Rosenstein!
> POTUS publicly expresses his anger re: his recusal?
Optics!
> Do you believe POTUS would allow a complete takeover of his DOJ if nothing was being done behind the scenes to hold people accountable?
No!
> When POTUS states the swamp is being drained do you believe it?
I do!
> When POTUS states its happening do you believe it?
Yes!
> Do you believe POTUS would allow Sessions & [RR] to run HIS DOJ if something wasnt being done to his liking?
LOGICAL THINKING.
Exactly! Trust Sessions! But do we trust RR?
> Mueller investigating POTUS Tweets for obstruction?
Nope!