Yes, and I believe that Tucker Carlson was the person who broke the story, and everyone else who reported it credited him as the source.
It's a shame he was pushing as news things that were simply not true.
Credibility as a reporter once lost is hard or impossible to regain.
A couple people roasted me on Twitter because it was Tucker.
I reiterated that anonymous sources have an axe to grind and it’s not okay for us to use them if it’s not okay for Dims to use them.
The Saturday release of the 400 pages of heavily redacted FISA warrant applications that were used to get surveillence going on Carter Page (and through him all of Team Trump) took a while for the best analysts (of the Good Guys, naturally) to digest and analyze. Here's a few of them I think you guys might find interesting:
FISA Warrant FOIA Release Analysis
Analysis of overall Mueller Case
and for those wanting a little more action in their reporting:
This iast ruling appears to put to rubbish late last week's big story that Tony Podesta had been granted immunity (was one of the five).
Right now that sure looks like fake news, and a lot of the right-wing news went along for the ride: The Daily Caller (Tucker is affiliated with them as well as Fox News), Newsmax, The Federalist, Washington Examiner, and Zero Hedge -- all quite wrong, apparently. Not a good day for them.
Enjoy!
You mean credibility for a conservative or normal reporter, right?
The list of our right bogus stories from the left is endless and yet they continue to show up all over.
Tucker will be fine.