Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: KavMan

No. Just because it might be real and truly from c. year 0/AD 33. does not mean it is Jesus.

It could just as well be another victim of that era and location.


40 posted on 07/17/2018 11:40:39 AM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Federal-run medical care is as good as state-run DMVs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: the OlLine Rebel

Of many many examples no other human remains have ever been found to produce an image. Remains decompose and soil the cloth. Natural mummies, bodies buried in hot dry areas where the body dedicated, do not leave images. On the DNA issue, the blood stains are highly degraded. Burial garments were considered ritually unclean. Jews would not have preserved used burial
Clothes unless they had a really good reason to do so.


43 posted on 07/17/2018 1:11:28 PM PDT by j.havenfarm ( 1,000 Posts as of 8/11/17! Still not shutting up after all these years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson