Replies

Uh... you are the one saying Jesus had no blood in His body after the Resurrection...

You have no scriptures but a perceived “omission” of the word “blood” on Christ’s part, which makes Jesus into some sort of tricky weird liar...

You paint a picture of Jesus as someone who would stand in front of His disciples and say “See, touch me, handle Me, I am myself not a ghost but flesh and bones”

... but presume the Disciples knew that He had no blood in His body at all when He said that?

Why would you presume that?

It is your presumption, based on your perception that Jesus PURPOSELY omitted the word blood when He said “flesh and bones” and you have nothing else to back you up...

... because I called you out on the lie that Jesus had no blood in His body after he died on the cross.

Are you, too, ashamed that you were caught in that lie?

Because He did have blood in His body after death.

And when He was resurrected.

You are deceived and under deception.

You paint a portrait of a lying, weirdo tricky Christ.

Jesus is a straight shooter. He says what He means with no ambiguity, and if you trust the Word is Truth, you will find it.

You have pushed a bloodless Frankenjesus with NO scriptures to back you up.

May the Lord rebuke you for pushing this nonsense.

We are not to even open the door to people who preach a different Gospel than what has been preached, but let them be accursed; this curse is upon your own head, for you preach a Frankenchrist.

No where in the Word does it say Jesus had no blood in His body after He died, or when He was risen.

You are making Jesus out to be a trickster, who would presume the Disciples knew He was bloodless when He SPECIFICALLY SAID “I AM FLESH AND BONES.”

Ridiculous, anti-Christ deception. You can’t admit I was right about there being blood in His body after death, and you can’t admit your entire doctrine is based on specious reasoning that taints your understanding of His sacrifice on the Cross, once and for all.