Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Mrs. Don-o

And I believe the Jesus would have indicated that He was in a glorified, bloodless state, but instead all He said was “See, touch Me, for I am not a ghost, but flesh and bones”...

The definition of flesh is that it has veins in it with blood in it.

The definition of bones are that they have bone marrow with a lot of blood in it.

Jesus was raised in the flesh, and this interfaces with John’s admonition that we believe “Jesus is come in the flesh”... and those who don’t believe Jesus is come in the flesh are against God (anti Christ).


111 posted on 07/17/2018 11:13:36 AM PDT by Sontagged (TY Lord Jesus for being the Way, the Truth & the Life. Have mercy on those trapped in the Snake Pit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]


To: Sontagged

Not one poster is claiming that Jesus did not come in the flesh. Where He is now He does not require blood to have LIFE in Him. As a human, as GOD come in the flesh of a human, His body had LIFE IN the blood. The blood is not the LIFE, the Word of God says plainly that The LIFE is IN the blood.


112 posted on 07/17/2018 11:20:42 AM PDT by MHGinTN (A dispensational perspective is a powerful tool for discernment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson