Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: miss marmelstein

Yes he was a good king who upset the establishment, LOL, something that needed doing then, much like today.

Richard made his home away from court during his brother’s reign which tells me he was sick of the palace intrigue (Woodvilles), and really didn’t want to be involved. If he was the ruthless, ambitious “politician” wouldn’t he have stayed at his brother’s side?

I believe he was a good and devout man who was caught up in circumstances. I doubt he wanted to be king but felt it was his duty and that brought him to London and away from his beloved Northern counties.


8 posted on 07/15/2018 5:59:01 AM PDT by The Deplorable Miss Lemon (If illegals are here to do the jobs Americans won't do why are so many illegals on welfare?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: The Deplorable Miss Lemon
And Shakespeare probably penned Richard III , where most folks get any knowledge they have of Dickie, in an effort to suck up to his patron, Elizabeth.
9 posted on 07/15/2018 6:11:43 AM PDT by mewzilla (Has the FBI been spying on members of Congress?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: The Deplorable Miss Lemon

Obviously, you are very familiar with the story. Are you a member of the Society?

He hated Edward’s court. He especially disliked his annoying brother-in-law, Tony Woodville, who had control of the two nephews and who led the coup against him when he was Lord Protector.


10 posted on 07/15/2018 6:17:38 AM PDT by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson