Replies

Prior Post #1008

Q !xowAT4Z3VQ ID: 8071a4 No.893904 📁
Apr 4 2018 14:52:00 (EST)

It was not supposed to be revealed POTUS is not under criminal investigation _ NOT YET.
Traitor.
Massive intel sweep.
Manafort was a plant.
Trace background.
Open source.
Who was arrested?
Non US.
Trace background.
Open source.
Carter Page was a plant.
Trace background.
Open source.
Why is Mueller going after 'inside plants'?
Flynn is safe.
Define 'witness'.
Can a 'witness' hold a position of power/influence while ongoing?
Russia Russia Russia?
Real or fake?
Fake?
JA?
Seth Rich?
MS_13 187 [2] -24 -Distance?
MS[13][13=M]MSM - The 'Wheel'
No investigation into WL receipt of information?
No pull down of NSA metadata trace/C to WL?
No pull down of NSA metadata period?
Nothing transferred across web?
Direct-to-Direct bypass dump?
No 'direct' investigation into DNC computer/software?
No 'direct' investigation into CS?
FBI/SC/DOJ/FED G simply TRUST CS's report on data breach? HUSSEIN block?
HUSSEIN control?
HUSSEIN "STATE SECRETS" WH NAT SEC ARTICLES 1-9 - BURIED?
Awan attached?
AMERICA FOR SALE.
Cheatin' Obama.
Trust the plan.
APRIL SHOWERS.
Q

The new Russian indictment is yet another oddity which I find difficult to interpret, because on the surface it is a pathetically weak move by all concerned.

You have shown in another post that the so-called evidence on the DNC server was probably planted, and clumsily so, by Crowdstrike.

This is no surprise. We knew about the data transfer rate, Seth Rich, and other circumstances casting grave doubts on the Russian hacking story.

We know from Wikileaks exactly that a STUPID phishing expedition succeeded in getting John Podesta to reveal his password, hence all the Hillary/Pizzagate emails. This did not require 13 Russian intelligence officers.

So what could possibly be accomplished in this indictment?

What if POTUS suggests to Putin that he needs to get his attorneys to demand the evidence against them—THE DNC SERVER?

If that is the plan ... then can RR be a white hat again?