[bagster]

Yes would be interesting to read but doesn’t change the fact that Awan will not be charged for any non-violent crime he committed in that jurisdiction prior to the plea for wire fraud.

Not just interesting to read, but crucial to your point. ANYTHING that Awan himself didn't make the court aware of (telling on himself) is not covered by any stipulation the court made regarding future charges.

Especially when the court made it clear that their ruling didn't BIND any other prosecutorial agency.

Here's how you may be right. Anything that Awan told the court that he did or was being accused of (but not charged with) may be subject to the terms of the deal as you describe them.

Anything else is and remains fair game. The bottom line is this. Awan is still exposed to any and all of his IT/spying related charges in ANY jurisdiction, including D.C.

Think about it. How could any court possibly rule that un-made charges not brought before the court and argued be ruled out of bounds. That on it's face is ridiculous, even to an untrained legal mind such as mine. And should be to yours too.

Unless of course, he made the court aware of ALL the dirt he did that we suspect (know) he did.

Expand your thinking.

#TrustSessions

Bagster

[LouisianaJoanof Arc]

I really liked your response until I got to the “expand your thinking” part which sounds insulting. I’m sure it’s not though :)

I see that too as a possible loophole but from reading tons of articles about his plea deal, and the fact that the prosecutors said they have nothing IT related to charge him with, I don’t see an out.

However, If there is a way for this sob to be charged I want to see it happen as much as anyone. I don’t have any faith that it will.

And I hate Session’s