Yes, it’s being held in evidence for a federal court case. All nice and legal. Anything held in evidence cannot be dissimenated to the public nor congresscritters. Not sure what your question is but I’d be more than happy to answer it.
An anon asked earlier: Was Strzok’s *real* superpower the ability to SCIF evidence like servers, knowing she was gonna win?
We have the Server. (cuz Strzok had to cough up its whereabouts?)
What if the information on the laptop contained evidence of other crimes. What is the obligation of the court regarding those newly discovered crimes?