LOL nice try, sorry you’ll have to provide your own sources.
http://video.foxnews.com/v/5747313286001/?playlist_id=5588264677001#sp=show-clips
The letter also informed Congress that Sessions had already appointed veteran prosecutors to look into other matters brought to the department’s attention, now believed to include possible abuse of FISA to improperly obtain search warrants to spy on people associated with then-candidate Donald Trump.
The letter explained:
“These senior prosecutors will report directly to the Attorney General and Deputy Attorney General, as appropriate, and will make recommendations as to whether any matters not currently under investigation should be opened, whether any matters currently under investigation require additional resources, or whether any matters merit the appointment of a Special Counsel.”
In other words, four months ago Sessions publicly informed Congress that he was looking into these matters with an eye to possibly appointing additional special prosecutors once he received these reports – but Congress, the media, and commentators either missed this public document or ignored it.
On March 7, Sessions reaffirmed his willingness to appoint another special counsel in an interview with Shannon Bream on Fox News at Night. He responded directly to congressional calls for a new special counsel.
[[[[very mixed feelings]]]]
...On March 7, Sessions reaffirmed his willingness to appoint another special counsel in an interview with Shannon Bream on Fox News at Night. He responded directly to congressional calls for a new special counsel....
and today, July 8, 4 months later what has happened? new special counsel? indictments? news? reports?
Justice delayed is justice denied.
The ONLY reason there should be a special counsel is when it has been demonstrated that the department is incapable of investigating itself, which I think it is but, for the time being I’m willing to wait for Huber to come up with something.
Yes. They are officially empowered “to make recommendations.” I agree with that 100%.
However, absolutely nowhere does it say they (Huber, IG, etc.) have been granted prosecution authority. The letter does not do that.
As the letter clearly states, his recommendations (if any) go straight to Rosensessions. That’s it. That’s all.
Where they (the recommendations) die (imo). Huber is NOT prosecuting anyone on the seditious matters. No prosecuter has been assigned to proceed with a criminal case, and nobody has been arrested. Proof: It would absolutely leak. Anyone honest knows that is true.
Just one arrest, and I would buy Huber flowers and turn into a Sessions fan. Just one.
See tagline.