Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: rockrr
But recognizing a practice and legitimizing that practice are two different things. Pragmatic northerners chose to turn a blind eye and offered the mealy-mouthed allowances as a sop to southern interests in order to gain what they all needed - a national union.

At the time, they were far more worried that the British would try to take them back than they were that the already several hundred year practice of slavery in America might continue awhile longer. In 1812 the British gave them good reason to fear being reabsorbed.

Also the slave states vastly outweighed the free states at that time. Had they chosen obstinance, they could have awaited the abolition of slavery in 1833 with the other British Subjects. No slavery, no Union.

68 posted on 07/04/2018 8:27:55 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp

Are you a History Professor? Best explanation I have ever heard on that era! Thanks.


71 posted on 07/04/2018 8:58:53 PM PDT by Ambrosia (Born in NC, then PA, NY,WV, NM, SC, and FL & back God/Freedom=Priority!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson