[Boogieman]

“But it is evidence of something being afoot, wouldn’t you say? 40k as opposed to 1K?

Sleepy Sessions is up to SOMETHING, right?”

Since we don’t know anything about them, it’s not really evidence of anything. We don’t have any way to know if Sessions is even connected to them at all.

“If you believe, like I do, that Q is a Trump authorized operation, then it follows that if you are working AGAINST the Q operation, like you are, that you are working against Trump.”

You can believe whatever you want, but that doesn’t make it reality.

“I’ll expect your groveling apology when I’m proven right, goodman.”

Sure, but that isn’t going to happen. I also have no doubt that just about every Q believer will never do the same, they’ll just keep on making excuses forever rather than admit they were wrong.

“Again, since I believe in Q, and Q said, “Trust Sessions” I must then trust Sessions.”

When your conspiracy theories make you start engaging in this kind of circular reasoning, it’s usually a sign that they aren’t very good theories.

[bagster]

Since we don’t know anything about them, it’s not really evidence of anything. We don’t have any way to know if Sessions is even connected to them at all.

Of course it's evidence of something. EVERYTHING is evidence of something. From this we can conclude at least two things. One, that the person at the top (Sessions) is not blocking investigations that lead to subpoenas like Holder/Lynch did. The results are many, many times greater than Obama/Bush/Clinton/Bush administration.

The 40k indictments are evidence that something unusual is happening. Agree?

You can believe whatever you want, but that doesn’t make it reality.

True, and right back atcha. But think of this. My belief is based on evidence, while yours is based on, what. Emotion? A pre-disposed inclination? I honestly don't think you've either a.) seen all the evidence or b.) given it an honest evaluation.

For example this latest proof. The AF-1 photo. You say that the apple reflectdion photo was "manipulated" from a stock photo that was available n the internet.

Where is your proof of that? Are you saying the reflection photo was photoshopped? Prove it. The "stock photos" were offered as proof (by anons) of where the reflection photo was taken. I believe the reflection photo was an original photo. Please feel free to prove me wrong.

I also have no doubt that just about every Q believer will never do the same, they’ll just keep on making excuses forever rather than admit they were wrong.

Oh no, goodman. I am a man of honor. I will be the first to admit my dumbassery if Q is proven to be false. I value my reputation as an honest man. Thing is, the disprovers are becoming more ridiculous as the proofs pile up.

I'm not rich, but I'll bet you a personal shiny nickel that I'm right on this. Write that down.

When your conspiracy theories make you start engaging in this kind of circular reasoning, it’s usually a sign that they aren’t very good theories.

I wouldn't call that circular thinking. I'd call that logical thinking. Going from one basic premise to the next, based on a belief in the first. If I believe in Q and what it is, then I must believe it is a Presidentially sanctioned operation with a "plan" to proceed.

Those involved in the plan have to know who else is involved in the plan and who is the enemy of that plan. If they tell me to "trust Sessions" then Sessions is part of the plan. It's pretty easy to make that connection. IF you believe Q is what he is purported to be.

And just so you know, you may even be part of the plan. Do you see Sessions being attacked by the media and deep state? Why not?

Good talk.

Bagster