Replies

Yeah, great proof right there.

So you're going with the "Apple reflection is fake" theory?

You do know the "stock" photo was posted by anons to compare the "reflection" photo to and prove it was taken on Air Force One, right? Or maybe you don't. Maybe you think Q posted the Trump sitting at the desk photo.

There is so much you don't get. But if you start with the basic premise that Q is fake, this is where you end up.

And yes, it is a great proof. One of many.

An open, analytical mind is required for this stuff, goodman. Give it a shot.

Bagster

“You do know the “stock” photo was posted by anons to compare the “reflection” photo to and prove it was taken on Air Force One, right?”

The photo is from NBC, it was publicly available to anyone on the internet. Seems like Q just took it and manipulated it, probably thinking his followers would never bother to do more than a simple image search to check on it, and since he introduced some distortion from the original image, an image search wouldn’t find the original photo.

If “Q” was legit, and really wanted to prove he was on Air Force One, he could just take an actual original photo that could be verified. Maybe just hold up today’s copy of the New York Times and take a snap with some identifiable place in AF1 in the background, for example. He doesn’t do that, though, because he can’t get on AF1, because he is just some dude in a basement somewhere. So he has to resort to stuff like using photos from an old NBC story and hoping nobody would notice.

"But if you start with the basic premise that Q is fake, this is where you end up.

...

An open, analytical mind is required for this stuff, goodman. Give it a shot."

I think this is the fundamental error right here. When you are dealing with an unproven assertion, you should look at it critically, which first and foremost means fairly evaluating all the possible arguments and evidence that can disprove the assertion. You're advocating for basically the opposite approach, to just assume the assertion is true and try to find ways to justify it. That is not critical thinking.

I did not start with the assumption that "Q is fake". I came to that conclusion after it became obvious that it was the most reasonable conclusion to be drawn based on the evidence. I have yet to see any evidence to convince me otherwise.