Yes, You're right. It's always best to go with the simplest conclusion. Meanwhile, the evidence piles up to the contrary. Best to ignore all of it, right?
Your brain is a wonderment.
Bagster
“Read the latest Q post dated July 4. Q addresses tht”
What? Did he finally acknowledge 8 months later that he is just a fraud making stuff up? Or is just making more excuses?
“I speak Q, let me decipher.”
No thanks. He made his predictions in plain english, very specific, with dates. They were false. He’s proven himself to be full of it. We don’t need a secret decoder ring to figure that out.
“THINK THINK THINK.”
Yes, I THINK he is a liar and fraud. That’s the simplest and most logical conclusion. You can keep up with the pretzel logic that is needed to come to another conclusion and we’ll see how that works out for you after maybe another year or so of failed predictions.
Yes, You're right. It's always best to go with the simplest conclusion. Meanwhile, the evidence piles up to the contrary. Best to ignore all of it, right?
Your brain is a wonderment.
Bagster