I think the reports used to generate the 40,000 (and it will always increase) number is better viewed on a "how many per month" sort of basis, and see if the RATE changes. My gut is telling me that if I look every day, I will see more (total) than if I look once a week, which will miss the cases that were filed sealed, then unsealed before I looked again.
Cboldt, I am having trouble making sense out of this claim about the 40K (or whatever the huge number is) of sealed indictments.
Do people REALLY think these are caused by the Huber investigation, and are Deep Staters/Leakers/Traitors who going to be rounded up some day at dawn?
As much as I wish it were so, I just can’t see it happening.
Or ... are they sex traffickers? If so, why wait?
For me, this angle is not being interpreted correctly. Not by a long shot.
IDLE SPECULATION: When I see “bad data” like this in my daily life, it often means we are counting duplicate entries or transfer entries that are not really distinct transactions; or, in some contexts, we are seeing entries which are cycling through the system.
I know that’s obscure, but I am trying to make some sense out of it.