Posted on 06/27/2018 10:00:55 PM PDT by ransomnote
RR was interesting when he said that the public portrayal in discussion of the 4th FISA is not consistent with his understanding of what it was for. They can’t keep taking the dossier back ... there had to be something else / more re Carter Page *OR* it’s a different tact. It remains a perplexing conundrum!
@POTUS_Schedule has been doing this for some time (months!) - I’ve posted their links here before when they’ve had little blurbs attached that match “Q” phraseology ;)
To me, in a nutshell, he came off as defensive, misdirecting, and obtuse. I see real institutional issues, and they don;t stop at the DOJ. The entire system, including the FISA judges, is a big expensive farce.
FBI is driving the FISA bus. DOJ is checking the odometer, and the judges assume that DOJ is critically reviewing the applications, so the judges do ZERO in the way of substantive review.
And to cap it off, the entire process is shrouded in secrecy, never to see the light of day.
Typical government function, and I am not in the least surprised to find the full "legal" power of the government used to subvert the political process.
Why is the date for the CenturyLink outage 6/27/18 when it happened 6/29/18? Just curious
I thought about that, but once they put the concept of real-looking fake videos out there, no democrats will believe a Hillary video showing her committing real crimes, and we will get nothing out of them.
He was also a little confusing talking about how he doesn’t sign off on FISA anymore, that he was only doing it because position that normally does was then empty. It was just funny the way he said it.
The “Q” post was two days ago; the actual outage was today.
Yeah I thought so... very well thought out,
not something thrown out off the cuff.
The picture with the BoB tattoo is of Asia Argento, Bourdain's girlfriend, not Angelina Jolie. But Corsi is still fat...
Thanks!
did you notice the tip page on the daily beast site?
https://www.thedailybeast.com/tips
The Daily Beast now uses the SecureDrop system to allow anonymous sources to send sensitive information and documents to our journalists.
Once a tip has been submitted to The Beast’s reporters, we will work on our end to verify the claim or documentation.
Please do not use this secure channel for standard editorial story pitches or general website feedback. The SecureDrop system is intended for use for sources in high-risk situations. SecureDrop is designed to protect the anonymity of our sources—although no system is 100% foolproof.
How to use SecureDrop:
Use a personal computer on a public wifi network. Be aware of your screen being filmed/overlooked by others.
Don’t use your home or work Internet to connect to SecureDrop.
Go to TorProject.org and follow the instructions to download the Tor browser.
Open the Tor browser and type this URL into the address bar: bcwyjiwj25t44it6.onion
Do NOT copy and paste it from here.
Follow the instructions to send us files or messages.
You will get a unique code name when you first use the site. This is your login for SecureDrop. Memorize this code name or save it in a secure place. Do not share this code name with others.
You can then submit information and send us messages. Use your code name to check back for replies. <<<< replies?
>>>so a two way encrytped message system?<<<
Q mentions securedrop a couple different times:
>James Dolan. Dead suicide
>Aaron swartz. Dead suicide
>Kevin Paulson. Turned over securedrop to Freedom of the Press
John Perry Barlow - 187 post name [DROP].
@Snowden
You are now a liability.
Q
628
Q
Jan 27 2018 13:09:33 (EST)
@Snowden.
The clock is ticking.
How’s Russia?
[Mr. Contractor]
Freedom of the Press.
John Perry Barlow.
https://freedom.press
SecureDrop [Whistleblowers]?
SecureDrop>Clowns In America.
NOBODY IS SAFE.
Q
561
Q
Jan 19 2018 03:23:37 (EST)
MSM is FAKE NEWS.
Propaganda.
Talking points [4am] - private email addresses.
Paid contractors.
JUDGEMENT DAY.
Q
>>>so who owns the daily beast?<<<
>>>and who is on the board of directors?<<<
Chelsea Clinton and a dozen other media billionaires from tickemaster, warner music, usa network, disney, abc, nbc, universal
http://www.iac.com/about/leadership/board-directors/chelsea-clinton
>>>IS IAC a front for the CIA mocking bird media? IAC = CIA ??? <<<
I think it’s a consonant you are looking for, not a vowel.
I just went to the link someone else posted and copied the image. I didn’t even look at the date, I assumed it was today’s outage. Good you noticed.
Our founding fathers did not fill our money with these symbols. They did not even establish a central bank. Prior to the establishment of the Federal Reserve System, there WAS NO CENTRAL BANK, and the US Government did not even print most money. Private banks printed their own money which was backed by gold they had stored in their own vaults and which a person with one of their certificates could appear at the bank and demand to exchange that certificate for its value in legitimate gold coin, minted by the US government mint, which certified it contained 90% gold at a certain weight in each coin.
Those symbols appeared when the Federal Reserve banks started issuing DEMAND NOTES, not gold or silver certificates. . . a note is an IOU. Essentially a piece of paper representing a DEBT. That money was BORROWED into existence from the Federal Reserve Bank. . . borrowed by the central government against future tax collections, and guaranteed by future tax payers that they would pay its face value back on demand.
The only previous times the government printed fiat notes was during the Civil War to fund the war and during the Revolutionary War. Not worth a Green Back? Not worth a Continental? Those were previous fiat note currency. . . which were essentially worthless when the government reneged on exchanging them. People wanted currency printed and distributed by LOCAL BANKS, and it didn't matter WHAT local banks. I've once had a $5 bill with Santa Claus' picture on it that was perfectly legal from the 1850s issued by a Boston Bank. . . exchangeable for $5 in silver coin.
This bill was honored anywhere and could be exchanged anywhere. . . and was. . . but you can imagine there was a lot of bogus, counterfeit bills for non-existent banks floating around. But, really, it didn't matter until the bill eventually found its way back to the originating bank which would dishonor it for the current bearer. But, in the meantime, it worked just fine for a means of exchange despite its bogus nature. What counterfeiting DID do was cause inflation by creating too much money chasing the goods and services in commerce, creating pressure to raise prices. That's why the Secret Service was originally created, to fight counterfeiting of bank notes, regardless of what banks printed and issued them.
But, to get back to the original point. Our Founding Fathers did not put anything on the money. That happened after 1913.
If it is possible for experts to tell fake from real, then there won’t be any problem.
And although there is no one less technically minded than me outside of up country Papua New Guinea, I am sure techies can still tell real video from fake.
Sounds like a FOCUS problem, to me. LOL.
You have a link for that prayingmedic vid? He’s top-flight, imho.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.