I find very interesting that your comments seem to suggest that 1. You alone have figured this all out (not by a long shot but who really cares) and 2. That you seem to imply shock of some sort that this is/was the plan all along. Wondering why you seem shocked when you also profess that you’ve figured it all out?
To me I don’t give a second thought to ones sign up date here, rather I read what is presented and your silly alt right nonsense was telling.
White supremacy, blech
Honestly, this is very hard to parse.
I find very interesting that your comments seem to suggest that 1. You alone have figured this all out (not by a long shot but who really cares) Well my recurring chart is of the most obvious information out there: who has been charged with a crime, plead guilty, or been fired after a formal investigation.
It was extremely surprising to me how much push back on got on this simple little chart.
Mostly that seems to have subsided. And, there is not a lot of movement in that right now on either side.
So, as regards that, no, I didn't figure anything out.
More recently I've tried to add some value to this continuing thread by posting things of interest to me.
My first post was on the NIXVM case, and had about 6 links in it, with some text tying them together. Presumably this is of interest to others here as it is quite clearly connected to one of the central themes of Q (the powerful pedo rings). Again, I wasn't claiming to have figured anything out, just aggregating public data that others may not have seen.
Several people found the posting interesting, and thanked me for it.
The next two postings had to do with the treatment of Q in the press. One the one side I examined that Q is breaking out into the right-wing blog-o-sphere, as evidence by Vox Day's postings, which I included. I pointed out who Vox Day was for those who might not know him. Someone asked me what about his famous 16 principles, so I posted that. It was not an endorsement of them. So, your characterization of me is incorrect.
But again, this was me putting up links to publicly available Q related stuff.
My third recent large posting on the thread was on the MSM coverage of Q, which seems to have picked up in both quantity and intensity of denunciation.
Once again I was not claiming to have some great insight: Q himself had called out one of the posts I linked.
I'm not sure why you are here, or what your focus is.
I am trying to do citizen research on the topics Q raises. I have chosen to focus on more "above board" sources, things that require less interpretation. I am not, for instance, ever going to be one of the people trying to decipher aerial photographs, but luckily there are many here who are.
Moving on to your point 2. That you seem to imply shock of some sort that this is/was the plan all along. Wondering why you seem shocked when you also profess that you’ve figured it all out?
This is an impenetrable comment. I don't believe I have figured it all out (much less) by myself, as I've explained above.
I am not sure what the "shock" is you are referring to exactly, but of course a lot of the Q allegations are extremely shocking to me.
In general if you want to criticize me that's your prerogative. If you want clear responses it would be better if you use the common Freeper convention of quoting my postings (in context) and asking me about them, as I have had the courtesy to do here, rather than just making off-target accusations.
But, of course, until you piss off the Admins you are free to do less if that floats your boat.
In general I don't go around telling other people how stupid their posts are. If I don't like them I just skip over them.
I view this as a friendly collective endevour, and while some amount of criticism, if constructive is good, I don't feel driven to force anyone to adopt my views, or denounce ideas that have about things that I disagree with.
Cheers!