Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: TruthWillWin
-- First post for Q drop 1602 was 1343, you missed it twice? --

Yep, missed it twice. In my defense, i was doing a plain text search on the word "dangerous," and didn't open the image you posted. This is what my view of FR looks like (I am mostly text-driven personality).


1,383 posted on 06/27/2018 10:33:06 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1378 | View Replies ]


To: All

PS “Texts taken out of context”
PS “While emotional over the election, I conduct myself w/ upmost integrity w/o bias while undertaking any such investigation, especially a high-profile case against the POTUS.”
PS “In hindsight, it was a bad idea to openly discuss my feelings, but, in no way did those feelings impact my ability to conduct a fair and proper investigation - we followed where the “facts” took us.”
PS “I decline to answer that question on advice from counsel.”
: When you state “where ‘facts’ led us” - what ‘facts’ are you referring to? To date, there has been zero evidence of any such collusion or connections between the Trump campaign and Russia.” In fact, the only facts discovered thus far have been between the Clinton camp and Russia and other foreign groups….”
PS “On advice of counsel, I decline to answer that question”
PS “Because of the ongoing investigation, such answers may violate the security of such investigations……….”
: “Mr S, I believe nobody here is buying what you are selling. I believe there was/is a serious effort on the part of people more senior than you to remove Mr Trump from office out of fear of what this Administration may uncover. I believe you are being dishonest in your answers and frankly shocked you agreed to come here today. I believe everyone on this panel (minus those from the other side of the aisle) knew exactly what your answers would be and if you think we are going to sit here and accept these answers you would be a foolish. We are also following the facts and once we uncover more (which we will) we will act accordingly. I’m glad you retained counsel - you’ll need one and hopefully they are very good.”
………………….
Q


1,384 posted on 06/27/2018 10:35:14 AM PDT by Enigo54 (Hank Reardon was right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1383 | View Replies ]

Okay .. Q posts what appear to be direct quotes ot Strzok tesimony today ...

Concludes with rebuttal ...

"Mr S, I believe nobody here is buying what you are selling. I believe there was/is a serious effort on the part of people more senior than you to remove Mr Trump from office out of fear of what this Administration may uncover. I believe you are being dishonest in your answers and frankly shocked you agreed to come here today. I believe everyone on this panel (minus those from the other side of the aisle) knew exactly what your answers would be and if you think we are going to sit here and accept these answers you would be a foolish. We are also following the facts and once we uncover more (which we will) we will act accordingly. I'm glad you retained counsel - you'll need one and hopefully they are very good."

ROAR!!

1,385 posted on 06/27/2018 10:35:40 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1383 | View Replies ]

To: Cboldt

You’d get on beautifully with my husband.


1,388 posted on 06/27/2018 10:37:15 AM PDT by mairdie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1383 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson