Replies

that vanity fair article is full of lies...absolute lies...

Yes. And there has been a spate of such articles recently. That is the second one that apparently comes from the same source or sources in the Mueller probe where they are (illegally) leaking and telling their pet reporters that there are indictments coming.

They other thing that I've noticed (and I believe Q noticed and commented on) is that the MSM has now taken up the topic of Q, itself, and is writing completely negative hit pieces on the Q phenomena.

Their was an initial small flurry of these back at the start of the year -- and then there was was a total MSM blackout on Q for months. Nothing more was said about Q in any of the MSM.

Now, suddenly, the topic is back.

Almost like they are getting worried, or reluctantly must admit it's too big to ignore.

Here are the most recent:

Daily Beast, yesterday: Curt Schilling Backs Pro-Trump 'QAnon' Conspiracy Theory
Daily Beast, 6/19/18: QAnon, the Crazy Pro-Trump Conspiracy, Melts Down Over OIG Report
Think Progress, 6/21/18: Trump’s latest attack on Democrats echoes a conspiracy theory from the fringes of the internet
Snopes, 6/22/18: Did Canada’s Prime Minister Say Canadians Don’t Need American Farmers Because ‘We Have Grocery Stores’?
This quote seemingly originated in a thread on QAnon.news, a web site dedicated to a bizarre right-wing conspiracy theory
Vice, 6/12/18 A Guide to QAnon, the New King of Right-Wing Conspiracy Theories

Q has himself noted the first one of these, as asked us to think about what it means. Here is that Q post:

Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: aa163e No.1917911 📁
Jun 26 2018 21:50:46 (EST)
https://www.thedailybeast.com/curt-schilling-backs-pro-trump-qanon-conspiracy-theory📁
Why are we a threat to them?
Q

I also notice that this is starting at the "edge" of the MSM. Their less valuable, less reputable properties (Vice, Buzzfeed, Daily Beast) are starting to amp up the anit-Q stories, while the more valuable and elite publications (Bloomberg News, Vanity Fair) are getting new Mueller-team leaks to try to resurrect his failing sideshow.

The apex of MSM coverage will be a story in the NY Times, in fact I find it interesting that they have not yet written anything on Q.

You will know they are more worried, and they are losing, when the "big guns" at the Times, WaPo, Boston Globe, New Yorker, Vanity Fair, and that tier of MSM starts addressing the topic.

And, at that point they will have really lost, the cat will be out of the bag, and Q's goal of breaking into everyday consciousness will be achieved. Eventually the MSM has to be harnessed to achieve the Great Awakening.

The MSM may continue to be hostile to Q (in fact, will be), but that won't stop much. They are hostile to Trump, but he has still used them as a free transmitter for his messages. They were, unwittingly, the top transmitter of Trump news, particularly during election season, even as he was calling them liars to their faces.

And of course, there is a double edge to this blade. As soon as the MSM have "debunked" Q, with all sorts of snark and snideness, then the truth bombs start to fall. The MSM will have once again shown them selves to be tools and fools.

So, that is part of why I agree with Q that it is important to monitor and ponder what the MSM are saying, and particularly when there is a new coordinated attack campaign, as clearly seems to be the case here.