Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: No_Doll_i
You may have the site but we have the source.

Deep State controls Wikileaks now?

We (Q's people) have the source (Assange/Server?)

I like the sound of this one.

Bagster

1,174 posted on 06/26/2018 10:17:51 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 998 | View Replies ]


To: bagster

Something/Someone came from Shanghai. I just don’t know if it was a server or JA or what..

TBD


1,179 posted on 06/26/2018 10:21:50 PM PDT by No_Doll_i
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1174 | View Replies ]

To: bagster
Some have taken it to the next level - source could also mean the source - SR - i.e. witness protection program. However, I think, in this case, you're right, WL compromised and JA is in check. In either scenario JA is in play. I've also seen some refs in context with a server and some unsourced anon saying a WL server was handed off to a friendly third party for transfer / exchange. The wildest speculation I've seen is that the "source" is ... Kim Dotcom. I thought, "I HOPE NOT!" LOL ;)
1,181 posted on 06/26/2018 10:28:45 PM PDT by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1174 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson