Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp

Semmes was indicted in 1866 on charges of treason. Those charges were later dropped. Semmes was not indicted for piracy. That would indicate that the senior officials of the Johnson administration recognized that he was acting within the accepted bounds of Naval warfare. The Royal and the French navies seemed satisfied that Semmes was acting in that manner also. Had they believed otherwise there standing orders would have allowed them to pursue the Alabama as a pirate.


16 posted on 06/20/2018 2:41:35 AM PDT by Bull Snipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Bull Snipe
Dodged my point. They treated him as if he was a real captain of a real ship of war of a sovereign nation. They did not treat him as if he were a criminal in rebellion against his government.

This business of "rebellion" was a carefully crafted legal fiction created for the sole purpose of lending some quasi legitimacy to the deliberate attack on another country.

17 posted on 06/20/2018 6:51:07 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson