Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: TexasGator

Oh, indeed Sir I have read all the replies.

Your comment “Nope” that no other rule applies is incorrect, as I explained in my post to you.

Also, “butting in” doesn’t apply on a public forum. Nowhere did I read that this was a (misguided) discussion between TexasGator and only those you agree with.


178 posted on 06/18/2018 2:51:00 PM PDT by JustOneStarfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies ]


To: JustOneStarfish

“Oh, indeed Sir I have read all the replies.

Your comment “Nope” that no other rule applies is incorrect, as I explained in my post to you.

Also, “butting in” doesn’t apply on a public forum. Nowhere did I read that this was a (misguided) discussion between TexasGator and only those you agree with.”

You arrogant ***. You butted in without understanding the thread and added words to my post to change the meaning!’


179 posted on 06/18/2018 10:27:37 PM PDT by TexasGator (Z1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies ]

To: JustOneStarfish
"Oh, indeed Sir I have read all the replies." REALLY??????????? Either you are lying or your reading comprehension is pretty bad .... ---------------------------------------- To: PAR35 READ EXCEPTION 1. 25 posted on ‎6‎/‎16‎/‎2018‎ ‎8‎:‎51‎:‎27‎ ‎PM by TexasGator (Z1) --------------------------------------------------- To: Hebrews 11:6 You should go back and read 1-2, EXCEPTION 1. 43 posted on ‎6‎/‎16‎/‎2018‎ ‎9‎:‎00‎:‎56‎ ‎PM by TexasGator (Z1) ---------------------------------------------------------- To: Hebrews 11:6 “45-2 was invoked properly. 1-2, disqualification, was not, but should be.” Dude, if 45-2 is invoked you CANNOT INVOKE 1-2! 46 posted on ‎6‎/‎16‎/‎2018‎ ‎9‎:‎02‎:‎41‎ ‎PM by TexasGator (Z1)
180 posted on 06/18/2018 10:32:43 PM PDT by TexasGator (Z1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies ]

To: JustOneStarfish
"Your comment “Nope” that no other rule applies is incorrect, as I explained in my post to you."

My other post was not formatted.

Just so you can read properly one of my posts which you said you have already read ....

To: Hebrews 11:6

“45-2 was invoked properly. 1-2, disqualification, was not, but should be.”

Dude, if 45-2 is invoked you CANNOT INVOKE 1-2!

46 posted on ‎6‎/‎16‎/‎2018‎ ‎9‎:‎02‎:‎41‎ ‎PM by TexasGator (Z1)

181 posted on 06/18/2018 10:37:19 PM PDT by TexasGator (Z1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies ]

To: JustOneStarfish

“Also, “butting in” doesn’t apply on a public forum.”

I used that term because you came into my conversation misrepresenting my post and acting like an arrogant *** making false statements about me.


189 posted on 06/19/2018 8:39:01 PM PDT by TexasGator (Z1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies ]

To: JustOneStarfish

“Also, “butting in” doesn’t apply on a public forum.”

I used that term because you came into my conversation misrepresenting my post and acting like an arrogant *** making false statements about me.


190 posted on 06/19/2018 9:44:34 PM PDT by TexasGator (Z1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies ]

To: JustOneStarfish

You sent me a long private reply but not one word to back up your claims.

Please quit misrepresenting my post and acting like an arrogant *** making false statements about me.


193 posted on 06/20/2018 9:13:59 PM PDT by TexasGator (Z1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies ]

To: JustOneStarfish
From your mail:

" In one post, you call Hebrews 11-6 to task about his confusion about Rule 1-2 (which you cited correctly,"

I am now thoroughly confused since you say I cited the rule correctly but blast me for being ignorant of the rules?

WTF?

194 posted on 06/20/2018 9:17:58 PM PDT by TexasGator (Z1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies ]

To: JustOneStarfish
"On this note, hopefully you will be pleased that I did not respond further to your foolishness in the public forum. As one private message commented, the only men who try to beat up on women are the ones who are either (a) utter *arses* or (b) suffering from sour grapes when their golf game is called into question by a woman. You will be happy to know that in my responses to the private message on that topic, I gave you the benefit of the doubt of NOT being a complete arse. Internet communication can be difficult, and that was what I attributed this to.....you just didn’t read or pay much attention if you had read, so take a deep breath and bury the hatchet. I’m trying to save you from yourself, here.

As was extended to another on this thread, if you find yourself in North Carolina at some point in time after I am fully cleared by my neurosurgeon and orthopedic surgeon to play, (at least another 3-6 months, unfortunately....ok’d for a few casual and easy rounds of golf, but nothing hardcore just yet, and no more long-drive....) I am happy to let bygones be bygones and put my money where my mouth is with respect to my golf game. Do come prepared to leave with a lighter wallet, though..... ;)"

Just a reminder that you took the first swing. Am I supposed to ask if you are part of a protected class before defending myself?

OTOH, I accept your courtesy of the invitation but my game is long gone.

195 posted on 06/20/2018 9:22:09 PM PDT by TexasGator (Z1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson