Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Hostage
🚨Peter Strzok agrees to testify before Congress WITHOUT immunity or 5th amendment - wapo
879 posted on 06/17/2018 1:32:13 PM PDT by txhurl (World War Q..... next stop: ....what IS the next stop? ........Spain?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 875 | View Replies ]


To: All; bagster

I’ve received a carrier pigeon from Texokie (computer still down). She found a forum thread that FreeQs may find of interest - some quotes from the related article below. Fortunately the pigeon was able to type, so the following is Texokie’s transcribed post:
___________________________________________

“Back in 2015, we witnessed some Walmart stores being abandoned for plumbing issues – they said. Remember at that time, Obama was President, so Trump cannot be blamed for anything which took place in 2015. However, NBC has just published a story revealing why Walmart abandoned some stores in 2015. But they are blaming President Trump for what began in 2015, but has manifested in 2018.

Before we look at 2018, let us go back to 2015. None of us knew why Walmart was abandoning some stores in California, Texas, Florida, and Oklahoma with no warning to the public. When this occurred thousands of people lost their jobs, but no one knew why this was happening. Walmart said they were closing due to plumbing issues; however, no one really believed that.

The SGV Tribune in California reported –

Walmart announced Monday that it is temporarily closing its Pico Rivera supercenter on Washington Boulevard due to plumbing problems but City Manager Rene Bobadilla said a union official told him that all 530 employees have been laid off.

James Enriquez, the city’s public works director, said officials have not been notified of plumbing issues at the store. The company would be required to pull permits before undertaking extensive work....”

Bottom line: the Walmarts were emptied and the govt compensated them so that they could use them for the influx of foreigners they were expecting to flood the borders.

Excellent article. Cleared up some questions for me! The article puts together a bunch of the puzzle pieces that we knew were important and bad, but could not see the pattern at the time.

Here’s the forum thread:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3663946/posts

Here’s the article linked:
http://www.investmentwatchblog.com/remember-president-obama-2015-walmart-stores-closed-jade-helm-2018-msm-blaming-president-trump-for-housing-illegal-immigrants/


884 posted on 06/17/2018 1:38:50 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 879 | View Replies ]

To: txhurl

“Peter Strzok agrees to testify before Congress WITHOUT immunity or 5th amendment - wapo”

It looks to me like Strzok/Struck is no longer willing to run interference for Hillary. He sees the handwriting on the wall.


891 posted on 06/17/2018 1:43:58 PM PDT by Typelouder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 879 | View Replies ]

To: txhurl
🚨Peter Strzok agrees to testify before Congress WITHOUT immunity or 5th amendment - wapo

___________________

Those who don’t act now know they cannot hide the reasons why.
Q

That's gonna be some damn fine t.v. :)

Bagster

900 posted on 06/17/2018 1:51:14 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 879 | View Replies ]

To: txhurl

No self-service in that article. Hope the House has someone to tear this POS apart.


903 posted on 06/17/2018 1:52:36 PM PDT by xone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 879 | View Replies ]

To: txhurl

> “As for Strzok’s more controversial exchanges with Page, Goelman (Strzok’s attorney) told the Post that there’s “no question” that his client regrets the messages, but that he was expressing his political opinions in what he thought was a private conversation.”

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/fbi-agent-peter-strzok-willing-to-testify-before-congress

So Strzok thought his intent to kill the King was private but now seeks “the chance to clear his name and tell his story.”

The fact is he was never going to be offered immunity and he was going to be subpoenaed. As far as not invoking his 5th Amendment right, it doesn’t matter. The incriminating evidence is already established. He took an Oath as part of his job meaning he’s squarely under the treason statute and if convicted could be put to death.


906 posted on 06/17/2018 2:00:16 PM PDT by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 879 | View Replies ]

To: txhurl
Peter Strzok agrees to testify before Congress WITHOUT immunity or 5th amendment - wapo

It should then be assumed that the Committee will have to submit multiple and voluminous criminal referrals.

1,052 posted on 06/17/2018 5:03:27 PM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 879 | View Replies ]

To: txhurl

I wonder if he’s going to play the “I was working undercover to find out who was helping Clinton” card.

Who knows - will he spill the beans, cop the 5th, or go off on some pack of lies in an attempt to look like the good guy?


1,054 posted on 06/17/2018 5:07:31 PM PDT by meyer (The Constitution says what it says, and it doesn't say what it doesn't say.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 879 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson