A great deal of speculation occurred when the NK nuke site suffered its collapse and explosion, several months ago. Many on the thread speculated that the United States might have used a "Rods from Gods" type weapon on the complex. For those that are unfamiliar with the concept basically a large mass is dropped from space on a given location. The mass could be something like a long rod made of tungsten or other extremely durable material that would penetrate deeply and use its kinetic energy alone to destroy the target. The rod would need a rudimentary guidance package and GPS locator to direct it.
One problem with this theory is you would need a pretty big booster to get a weapons package into orbit and such launches would be noticed. The United States does launch the occasional classified payload into space. The aviation and space community usually does a pretty good job of identifying the types of spy satellites that have been launched. To the best of my knowledge we have not launched many unidentified secret payloads, or at least they haven't been noted.
However, if the weapons package could be launched from a submarine, via a trident d5 missile, the launch could happen anywhere in the world. Only two nations currently have satellite networks that monitor for missile launch, the US and the Russians. Those systems though look primarily at areas where a SSBN could place a nuclear missile into our territory. Vast stretches of the southern hemisphere would be wide open.
What I think has happened is that the United States has deployed some form of a "Rods from God" type weapon. That weapon was kept as a secret project. The weapon was used to destroy facilities in North Korea.
This brings us to the launch the other day. The launch was from the Puget sound area , and the consensus was that it was fired to the North. A "Rods from God" weapon would ideally be stored in a polar orbit. This makes it so every location on earth is flown over.
So why launch the weapon from an area where everybody can see it. With the prior use in NK it is probably that most of the bad actors on the planet know what happened. Some of them may doubt we have the capability to launch more of these, or may doubt that we can replenish this weapon system easily. The launch near Seattle was a direct threat/show of force to other bad actors, probably Iran since we have been told they are next. We are telling them quite simply "YOU ARE NEXT AND WE MEAN IT". I don't think it was the deep state at all doing this.
A couple of other notes. It is also possible that we have the rods from god weapon but that it is sub-orbital only thus the launch near Seattle was because we found a real time threat that needed to be neutralized in a hurry, a northern trajectory would work for targets all over the Eurasian land mass. I first got this idea when some freepers were talking about the Trident D5 missile that our SSBN's use. I remembered reading that it is a solid fuel missile. I also remember reading articles about how solid fuel missiles have a shelf life, they were talking about stingers in that case but all of them suffer from cracks and voids forming in the missile fuel. It occurred to me that a good use for an end of life trident D5 rocket motor would be placing weapons packages in low earth orbit. The standard guidance package and MIRV equipment could be removed from the missiles, hopefully not sold to the Chinese ala Clinton and Loral. A simpler weapons package put in its place. Cart the missiles to a remote corner of the pacific. Have the crew launch them. The crew wouldn't even have to know what they were launching, just fire these off in this direction. If a few of the missiles fail to reach orbit because of motor failure just make sure they splash over empty ocean. Another thing that got me thinking on these lines is my visit to the Titan missile museum near Tucson. I remember them telling us that when the Titan missiles were retired they were repurposed as satellite launch vehicles.
Of course the obvious question here is do I have any proof, not a shred. This could be done but has it been done is another question. Of course it maybe some variation of what I mentioned as well, sub orbital versus orbital, a sub orbital weapon would necessitate launching in real time, we could also try and see if something went boom in the hour after the Seattle missile launch. If you have read this far thank you for taking the time to do so, and again this is my speculation take it for what it is worth.
Q
B*U*M*P!!
(clapping)
I think your theory is solid and that it is certainly possible that old missiles can be use for launch vehicles, but nothing else fits the context that q dropped that this was not planned and was not the good guys.
You also have the Trump tweet from June 11th Notice the two misspelled words; Missile and Stopped, there are no coincidences....
(2) MISSILE FIRES W/ A STRATEGIC PURPOSE
(2) EXTINGUISHED.
THIS IS NOT A GAME.
THIS IS WAR.
MISSILE.
MISSLE.
FOX THREE.
SPLASH.
This is not a game.
Certain events were not suppose to take place.
Q
1475
Jun 12 2018 15:55:46 (EST)
FOX M1 STOLEN TAKEDOWN
Donald J. Trump
Verified account
@realDonaldTrump
Jun 11
The fact that I am having a meeting is a major loss for the U.S., say the haters & losers. We have our hostages, testing, research and all missle launches have stoped, and these pundits, who have called me wrong from the beginning, have nothing else they can say! We will be fine!
Interesting theory, however, Q said about that missile “Certain events were not supposed to take place” then mentioned “hack” under a photo of a submarine the next post. Doubt you are correct.